由 davidlee0222 » 2005-01-23 14:43
真是抱歉抱歉
AGK老大問小弟問題
小弟居然沒發現..
還請老大海涵
先回答AGK大大的問題
小弟個人是以"句"為單位進行"兩段式"速讀
每句抓完主要結構到句點，會回頭去"拎"次要結構
因此每句看完都會抓到完整句意及前後文功能
而且超快
基本上不太會出現遺漏
也不太需要回文
因為該take note的在讀文時就take好了
真要回文只有為了比對note跟原文是否有遺漏
或有的太細take note會浪費時間
只標行數回去看
當初小弟做這篇時
是跟讀書會現場破解
記得是讀完不到10分鐘全對
由於克麗斯汀在場
因此之前才請她進行解說
小弟將本文再做詳細示範
紅色為主要結構
主辭加底線
次要結構用咖啡色
不重要的"補述的補述"用紫色
重要關鍵字用粗體
因此以句為單位第一次只看紅字(可伴咖啡字)
一次看到句點了解主軸
再回到該句看補述有沒有補充蛇麼
Most pre-1990 literature on businesses’use of information technology (IT) —(破折號先跳，先找動詞，到句點再回頭拎) defined as any form of computer-based information system—focused (主要動詞)on spectacular IT successes and reflected a general optimism concerning IT’s potential as a resource for creating competitive advantage.( 主辭是"舊文獻"，探視IT的成功及樂觀反應，認為IT使用可以產生競爭力)
But toward the end of the 1980’s, some economists spoke of a "productivity paradox”: despite huge IT investments, most notably in the service sectors, productivity stagnated(主要動辭).
In the retail industry, for example, in which IT had been widely adopted during the 1980’s, productivity (average output per hour) rose at an average annual rate of 1.1 percent between 1973 and 1989, compared with 2.4 percent in the preceding 25-year period. Proponents of IT argued that it takes both time and a critical mass of investment for IT to yield benefits, and some suggested that growth figures for the 1990’s proved these benefits were finally being realized. They also argued that measures of productivity ignore what would have happened without investments in IT—productivity gains might have been even lower. There were even claims that IT had improved the performance of the service sector significantly, although macroeconomic measures of productivity did not reflect the improvement.
But some observers questioned why,(有人又提出質疑) if IT had conferred economic value, it did not produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms. Resource-based theory offers an answer, asserting that, in general, firms gain competitive advantages by accumulating resources that are economically valuable, relatively scarce, and not easily replicated. According to a recent study of retail firms, which confirmed that IT has become pervasive and relatively easy to acquire(先跳過,到句點再回來拎), IT by itself appeared to have conferred little advantage(到句點回頭看掠過的有補充啥?-原來是研究說IT對(IT易得的)零售商沒蛇麼用). In fact, though little evidence of any direct effect was found, the frequent negative correlations between IT and performance suggested that IT had probably weakened some firms’ competitive positions. However, firms’ human resources, in and of themselves, did(強調) explain improved performance, and some firms gained IT-related advantages by merging IT with complementary resources, particularly human resources.The findings support the notion, founded in resource-based theory, that competitive advantages do not arise from easily replicated resources, no matter how impressive or economically valuable they may be(先看由哪裡取得,再回來看不是由哪裡取得), but from complex, intangible resources.
GWD-5-Q23:
The passage suggests that proponents of resource-based theory would be likely to explain IT’s inability to produce direct competitive advantages for individual firms by pointing out that
理論說：IT對那些(易得IT的)零售商沒蛇麼幫助
A對
a.IT is not a resource that is difficult to obtain
b.IT is not an economically valuable resource
c.IT is a complex, intangible resource
d.economic progress has resulted from IT only in the service sector
e.changes brought about by IT cannot be detected by macroeconomic measures
B錯
C錯
D不是只有在服務部分
E講IT帶來的改變無法由巨觀衡量來探測
也錯
呼~
夭壽
本來打了一個半小時打好了
結果給偶當機..
太讓偶花轟ㄌ~
