24-14: In 1983 Argonia’s currency, the argon, underwent a reduction in value relative to the world’s strongest currencies. This reduction resulted in a significant increase in Argonia’s exports over 1982 levels. In 1987 a similar reduction in the value of the argon led to another increase in Argonia’s exports. Faced with the need to increase exports yet again, Argonia’s finance minister has proposed another reduction in the value of the argon.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the prediction that the finance minister’s plan will not result in a significant increase in Argonia’s exports next year?
A) The value of the argon rose sharply last year against the world’s strongest currencies.
B) In 1988 the argon lost a small amount of its value, and Argonians exports rose slightly in 1989.
C) The value of Argonia’s exports was lower last year than it was the year before.
D) All of Argonia’s export products are made by factories that were operating at full capacity last year, and new factories would take years to build.
E) Reductions in the value of the argon have almost always led to significant reductions in the amount of goods and services that Argonians purchase from abroad.
題目最後一句不太能理解
Faced with the need to increase exports yet again, Argonia’s finance minister has proposed another reduction in the value of the argon.
minister到底是支持還是反對reductiuon
為什麼他還要proposed another reduction
如果反對他應該要避免redution而不是proposed another reduction
然後問題又說他的計畫will not result in a significant increase
那不就表示他反對嗎
搞不懂題目說他還要proposed another reduction????
誰來幫幫我.......