Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD-1-Q18

GWD-1-Q18

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD-1-Q18

文章撥撥 » 2005-08-24 09:24

Q18:
It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except in professional medical journals or by mail directly to physicians. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that, in general, laypersons lack the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, the objection provides no grounds for concern.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

A. Whether nonprescription medications can interact with and block the action of any prescription medications that could be advertised to the general public
B. Whether most prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would be advertisements for recently developed medications newly available by prescription
C. Whether prescription medication advertisements directed at the general public would appear on television and radio as well as in print
D. Whether physicians are more likely to pay attention to advertising directed to the general public than to advertising directed to physicians
E. Whether physicians are likely to succumb to pressure from patients to prescribe inappropriate medications

本題答案為(E),我選了(A)
能不能向大家請益?? ;-$
Here comes the Bright Future
頭像
撥撥
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 66
註冊時間: 2005-05-02 16:36
來自: Taipei

文章zuckzhc » 2005-08-24 10:48

文章中說,藥品的廣告實際上並不會對醫生開處方造成影響,因為最後的決定是在醫生,問題問何者最能評估文章 的論點,所以我們要找一個評斷的方法,看看是否醫生的決定實際上是會被廣告影響,或著是醫生實際上到底不是 做最後決定的人

答案A是有關非處方藥與處方藥的關係,與我們要討論的無關
答案E問說醫生是否會屈服於病患的壓力而開不適當的藥,如果是的話,醫生實際上在開處方的過程中並不是全然 自己做決定,而是會受到第三者的影響,文章的論點就不成立,也就是說只要廣告說服消費者的話,消費者的意願很可能去影響到醫生的決定; 反之,如果醫生不為所動,則支持文章的論點

這個選項很清楚的可以評估到底文章中的論點是否足以支持文章中的主張
只要有心,人人都可以是牛人
頭像
zuckzhc
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 198
註冊時間: 2005-03-25 04:47

文章撥撥 » 2005-08-24 10:57

ZUCKZHC大大講解的超清楚

將子我就了解了
謝謝喔∼
Here comes the Bright Future
頭像
撥撥
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 66
註冊時間: 2005-05-02 16:36
來自: Taipei

文章zuckzhc » 2005-08-24 17:07

不客氣
希望您以後可以常來討論;CC
不過建議一下
下次可以把自己的思路寫上去
像是為什麼選A,為什麼覺得E不對
這樣可以幫助您自己釐清思路
其他有同樣想法的人也能ㄧ起討論

加油加油 8-|
只要有心,人人都可以是牛人
頭像
zuckzhc
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 198
註冊時間: 2005-03-25 04:47

文章chris8888 » 2008-01-20 23:28

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals. A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications. Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications. But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.

Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?

(A) Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable
處方藥的廣告是否可能提醒病人注意到小病的有效治療確實存在, 這小併之前被認為是治不到的, 無關選項, 提醒不提醒無助於回答(是有關final say 最後開處方的決定權)
(B) Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised
人們看醫生的理由無關(是有關final say 最後開處方的決定權)
(C) Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians
是否有針對一般社會大眾的處方藥廣告提供相同的資訊就如同真對醫師的廣告提供一樣. 提供的資訊相同性, 無關(是有關final say 最後開處方的決定權)
(D) Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians
廣告是資訊來源這無關選項, (是有關final say 最後開處方的決定權)
(E) Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired
give in 退讓於 ...
醫生面對之前開的處方失效, 是否會屈服於病人的要求. (是有關final say 最後開處方的決定權) 對啦!!!
頭像
chris8888
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 444
註冊時間: 2007-07-31 22:47


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客