求教 OG 50

[josephko]

請教各位戰友 這題
50. As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500. or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision.
(B)A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult sense of vision
(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult
(D)A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.
(E)As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500. blind
In choice A, it, the subject of the main clause, seems to refer to baby, the subject of the subordinate clause; thus, A seems to state that the newbom baby, rather than its sense of vision, would be rated 20/500. Similarly, choices B and E use awkward and ambiguous phrasing that suggests that the sense of vision, rather than an adult with 20/500 vision, would be considered legally blind. C incorrectly uses the semicolon, which should separate independent clauses, to set off a verb phrase. The phrase if an adult in C is also illogical, since it states that a baby could also be an adult. D is the best choice.

我想請教最後這一句說明, if an adult為什麼會使baby could also be an adult
可以幫我還原出完整句子嗎? 感謝囉 ;)

[josephko]

另外像這種考指代的題目,我實在很沒信心判別哪個選項是指代不清, 因為裡頭有it又有that ...
可以請戰友們告訴我面對這種問題時,有把握的解題方法, 或是用別的例子說明看看,感謝囉

[micht]

(D) ; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult

句子不完整押....... ; 前後連結兩個獨立子句

A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind.

大致意思是
baby 未出生前...in the womb 感光程度約 20/500; 如果一個成年仍感光程度 20/500
會看不見

[Pufa]

另外像這種考指代的題目,我實在很沒信心判別哪個選項是指代不清, 因為裡頭有it又有that ...
可以請戰友們告訴我面對這種問題時,有把握的解題方法, 或是用別的例子說明看看,感謝囉

小意見
當代名詞同時有好幾個可能的指代對象時，這種選項盡量不要選。
當句子裡有好幾個名詞時，盡量減少代詞的使用，這樣較能正確表達句意。
代名詞一般優先指代距離較近的名詞，
但較保險的做法是，
同時考慮代詞後的動詞是否和指代對象的一致，以及句意是否合理。

[魚]

(C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult

我想請教最後這一句說明, if an adult為什麼會使baby could also be an adult可以幫我還原出完整句子嗎? 感謝囉 ;)

這句話的意思是說 :

如果 qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult
中的 it 是指baby
醬if 引導的句子中的主詞也會是baby 醬的話 是假設 if baby were an adult==>醬不是很怪嗎

[Ethan]

這句話的意思是說 :

如果 qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult
中的 it 是指baby
醬if 引導的句子中的主詞也會是baby 醬的話 是假設 if baby were an adult==>醬不是很怪嗎[/quote]

To 魚:
不會，你覺得那一點讓你不明白的?

[Behemoth]

To Ethan:

我想魚不是不了解,只是說c的句子邏輯不通,所以不選...

[魚]

To Ethan:

我想魚不是不了解,只是說c的句子邏輯不通,所以不選...

(Y) 是啊 我就那意思 我果真是個口齒不輕的傢伙 :-$

[josephko]

謝謝大家的協助, :D

[Lian]

這題我的判斷依據是baby不可用it代,因為baby已經出生,可知其性別,
不知道這個解題想法對不對,謝謝

[agk99]

It is interesting to kick out the wrong answer by identifying their sex. I am not sure, but, it worth to discuss.

[shine_allen]

我想請問(不考慮對錯的話)
A選項的it代替誰?
E選項的which代替誰?

[shine_allen]

那這段解釋是什麼意思
In choice A, it, the subject of the main clause, seems to refer to baby, the subject of the subordinate clause; thus, A seems to state that the newbom baby, rather than its sense of vision, would be rated 20/500.

難道it不能代替the sense of vision嗎

[michelle610]

In choice A, it, the subject of the main clause, seems to refer to baby, the subject of the subordinate clause; thus, A seems to state that the newbom baby, rather than its sense of vision, would be rated 20/500
-------->這裡應該是說 it可能會指代baby或是指代the sense of vision 會造成歧易 所以不選囉

[pimi]

我還是不太了解C中OG解釋的The phrase if an adult in C is also illogical, since it states that a baby could also be an adult.

qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult
前面有大大說原形是qualifying it to be legally blind if baby were an adult
請問大大如何從qualifying it to be legally blind 看出這句話的主詞是baby, qualifying it中的it是baby, 但是這個it也只是個受詞, 真的不懂為何可以推出if an adult的主詞是baby????

真的不了解為何ＯＧ解釋C會說since it states that a baby could also be an adult......@ @
請大大提點~~