Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - og-19

og-19

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

og-19

文章 » 2004-12-18 20:05

19. In addition to having more protein -than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
(A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in
(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in
(C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in
(D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is in
(E) rice has a protein higher in quality than

here is my question :

In C and D, the comparative structure higher in quality than it is in wheat absurdly suggests that rice protein contains wheat.

想請問 C / D 的寫法為啥會有ETS所說的 rice protein contains wheat 的句意出現 *-)

謝謝 i80
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-18 20:24

純粹是脫節概念

cd中變成是rice protein來having...

那麼不就變成了rice protein有prptein跟wheat了嗎

所以解答就這麼寫了出來
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章 » 2004-12-18 20:39

B 爺我知道C/D部分的dangling問題

不過
the protein in rice have more protein than wheat does

B爺您是說醬就會有rice protein contains wheat 的句意 :o
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-18 20:56

抱歉 血都在肚子裡 見笑了

重來 前面不算 真是誤人子弟!!!

單看後面這句就行了

這裡變成quality跟wheat比

就變rice protein有wheat的奇怪意思了
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章 » 2004-12-18 21:08

若是醬 ,
the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in wheat

1.the protein in rice=it

所以the protein in rice is higher in quality than the protein in rice is in wheat

單看後面 the protein in rice is in wheat 醬應該是 wheat contain rice 吧 *-)

2. the protein= it

the protein in rice is higher in quality than the protein is in wheat

這是錯誤比較 拿quality 跟 wheat 比

怎麼會出現 ETS說的 rice protein contains wheat 8-)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-18 21:41

基本上是你第一種說法

這裡的in解釋為 在...方面 比較好

這麼一來

就變成rice protein 在quality方面比在wheat方面 較多

那麼就是這個意思~
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

文章 » 2004-12-18 21:54

Behemoth \$m[1]:
就變成rice protein 在quality方面比在wheat方面 較多

那麼就是這個意思~


:D :D :D :D :D :D :D

對耶 i57

B 爺 您對OG 的了解真是透徹耶.....

我果真是摸魚大班的 (H)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章Behemoth » 2004-12-19 15:33

快別這麼說

我眼睛常禿垂

常常人家問東我答西

怪不好意思的 i85
Eric Chang
MBA Class of 2008
MIT Sloan School of Management
頭像
Behemoth
管理員
管理員
 
文章: 2948
註冊時間: 2004-09-10 18:19
來自: Boston

Re: og-19

文章dawn » 2005-06-04 15:53

OG Review到這一題,對於正確答案B產生困惑

(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in

OG的解釋是這樣:B, the best choice, logically compares wheat to rice by placing the noun rice immediately after the initial clause. B also uses that to refer to protein in making the comparison between the proteins of rice and wheat

如紅色部分所言,that在此是指代protein,但是在我看來,that也可以指代rice啊,這樣不就犯了ambiguous的錯誤 :sad

唉,這題如果對稱就好了,為什麼ETS不讓它對稱呢 *-)

希望有大人能好心幫我解答,謝謝
我說過你有潛力,但我沒說你很棒。現在,你是要回家去找媽咪哭泣呢,還是繼續練習下去? ─ 『妖術師』的巴爾札克先生
dawn
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 53
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 11:05

文章lightblue » 2005-06-07 00:04

我的看法是 that 在這不能代rice
因為我認為在此rice 不是在任何的名詞的功能
而是in rice 修protein 所以這裡不可能是rice

不知道這樣對不對
個人的看法 請大家不吝指教 :P
頭像
lightblue
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 57
註冊時間: 2005-03-03 23:37

Re: og-19

文章維尼 » 2005-06-07 00:28

dawn \$m[1]:OG Review到這一題,對於正確答案B產生困惑

(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in

OG的解釋是這樣:B, the best choice, logically compares wheat to rice by placing the noun rice immediately after the initial clause. B also uses that to refer to protein in making the comparison between the proteins of rice and wheat

如紅色部分所言,that在此是指代protein,但是在我看來,that也可以指代rice啊,這樣不就犯了ambiguous的錯誤 :sad

唉,這題如果對稱就好了,為什麼ETS不讓它對稱呢 *-)

希望有大人能好心幫我解答,謝謝


呵呵
其他四個答案都錯得離譜
無路可退囉 :PP

不過我個人覺得並不會有 ambiguity
因為比較級 higher 修飾 quality
而 high(er) quality 修飾 protein
所以 that 不會推到 rice 只會推到 protein :)
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

Re: og-19

文章dawn » 2005-06-08 22:53

維尼 \$m[1]:
呵呵
其他四個答案都錯得離譜
無路可退囉 :PP

不過我個人覺得並不會有 ambiguity
因為比較級 higher 修飾 quality
而 high(er) quality 修飾 protein
所以 that 不會推到 rice 只會推到 protein :)


謝謝解釋,再重複一下您的意思,是因為比較的兩個句子不對稱,所以才用優先指代最近名詞原則嗎?所以才不會造成ambiguity?
我說過你有潛力,但我沒說你很棒。現在,你是要回家去找媽咪哭泣呢,還是繼續練習下去? ─ 『妖術師』的巴爾札克先生
dawn
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 53
註冊時間: 2005-02-24 11:05

Re: og-19

文章truthx » 2005-09-10 17:08

魚 \$m[1]:19. In addition to having more protein -than wheat does, the protein in rice is higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.
(A) the protein in rice is higher quality than that in
(B) rice has protein of higher quality than that in
(C) the protein in rice is higher in quality than it is in
(D) rice protein is higher in quality than it is in
(E) rice has a protein higher in quality than

here is my question :

In C and D, the comparative structure higher in quality than it is in wheat absurdly suggests that rice protein contains wheat.


補充一下:
In addition to Ving, S.+V.
這裡Ving的主詞應該是後面的S.,所以A/C/D中的主詞都不應該是protein,能夠選的只剩下B/E、B絕對比E好、就只能選B了。
頭像
truthx
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 12
註冊時間: 2005-03-10 17:05

文章CUGGYER » 2005-09-10 17:29

補充E錯誤點
1 protein為專有名詞不可加冠詞a
2 more than硬梆梆比較 沒有that不知跟什麼比較
CUGGYER
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 200
註冊時間: 2005-08-23 20:41

文章sleek » 2005-09-12 23:52

CUGGYER \$m[1]:補充E錯誤點
1 protein為專有名詞不可加冠詞a
2 more than硬梆梆比較 沒有that不知跟什麼比較


請問如何硬梆挷比較?而沒有加that又會造成比較上如何錯誤?
謝謝~
sleek
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 146
註冊時間: 2005-02-20 22:32

下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 8 位訪客