Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題] 大全-16-6

[問題] 大全-16-6

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題] 大全-16-6

帖子lunar916 » 2005-09-18 00:24

大全-16-6
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
(A) It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
(B) It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
(C) It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
(D) It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
(E) It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.



ans: e
----
我選B... 看不太出來E哪裡對ㄟ...


還有我發現好像版上有一題標題是大全-16-6,可是好像應該是大全-15-6
可能要麻煩版大改一下~
头像
lunar916
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 415
注册: 2005-07-01 13:56

帖子Pufa » 2005-09-18 00:32

這是一個平均值與極端值的問題。
樣本是否聚集在平均值附近? 樣本Sa--(S國平均值)--樣本Sb
還是發散? 樣本Ta------------------(T國平均值)------------------樣本Tb

仔細看清楚題目應該就差不多了,還有問題的話再討論囉。
You get what you share
头像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1477
注册: 2004-10-25 17:37

帖子lunar916 » 2005-09-18 00:39

Pufa \$m[1]:這是一個平均值與極端值的問題。
樣本是否聚集在平均值附近? 樣本Sa--(S國平均值)--樣本Sb
還是發散? 樣本Ta------------------(T國平均值)------------------樣本Tb

仔細看清楚題目應該就差不多了,還有問題的話再討論囉。


ㄛ~ 我懂你的意思了~~
感謝~
嗯... 可是B的答案感覺也滿有weaken的效果ㄚ~
头像
lunar916
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 415
注册: 2005-07-01 13:56

帖子Pufa » 2005-09-18 00:54

lunar916 \$m[1]:
Pufa \$m[1]:這是一個平均值與極端值的問題。
樣本是否聚集在平均值附近? 樣本Sa--(S國平均值)--樣本Sb
還是發散? 樣本Ta------------------(T國平均值)------------------樣本Tb

仔細看清楚題目應該就差不多了,還有問題的話再討論囉。


ㄛ~ 我懂你的意思了~~
感謝~
嗯... 可是B的答案感覺也滿有weaken的效果ㄚ~



關於B,
題目的重點不是討論貧窮的確切水準;此外,這題作者是在同一個時空情境之下針對兩個不同的國家作討論,所以討論貧窮的確切水準沒有意義。
但是在不同的時空背景下就不一樣了,請看:
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=8756
You get what you share
头像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1477
注册: 2004-10-25 17:37


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 4 位游客