fei fei Q81

[CUGGYER]

82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.


Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?
Which one of the following, if true, would cast doubt on the experimenters’ conclusion?

A. Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.
B. The whole truth cannot be known.
C. It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.
D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.
E. If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

藍色是詳解上的題目 (答案A)
綠色是題本上的題目 (請問那這個答案 是什麼呢?)
我自己選了D

[Pufa]

第二題我選E.....

[CUGGYER]

would cast doubt on the experimenters’ conclusion
conclusion:
Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

D. It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.
E. If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

我是覺得兩個答案都能解釋
但是文章有說PGOTOGRAPHY 無反完全反映真實 所以不能當證據
But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense,
E說了 PHOTOGRAPHY可以直接當證據 (沒有講理由 似乎有點果斷)

而D 說明PHOTOGRAPHY還是能夠拿來當證據 只要有additional evidence establishing the truth 因此證實CONCLUSION是錯的

是我選擇D的原因
請問DE 還有哪些不同處可以下判斷呢?