Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]大全B-1

[問題]大全B-1

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]大全B-1

文章Alycia » 2005-09-27 21:26

大全-B-1. Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.
A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?
(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.


I understand why B is the answer...but...isn't A also kind of like the answer? Because in the passage, it says " Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation" ......?
Alycia
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 46
註冊時間: 2005-07-27 23:38

文章evelight » 2005-09-27 22:22

Dear Alycia:

歡迎來到CR板
提問前,請先參考置頂文
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=7137

簡單的說,就是把你對題目、選項的理解儘量寫出來
根據經驗,50%的問題會在這個理解、敘述過程中自我釐清
剩下的50%,因為你提供了足夠資訊
大家也好對症下藥幫你 :)
Crystal Wu
Georgetown MBA of 2008
頭像
evelight
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 421
註冊時間: 2005-01-01 04:16

Re: [問題]大全B-1

文章davidslin » 2005-10-08 17:59

Alycia \$m[1]:大全-B-1. Below is an excerpt from a letter that was sent by the chairman of a corporation to the stockholders.
A number of charges have been raised against me, some serious, some trivial. Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation. Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty. Furthermore, as the corporation’s unbroken six-year record of growth will show, my conduct of my official duties as chairman has only helped enhance the success of the corporation, and so benefited every stockholder.
Which of the following can be properly inferred from the excerpt?
(A) The chairman believes that all those who have demanded his resignation are motivated by desire to control the corporation for their own purposes.
(B) Any misdeeds that the chairman may have committed were motivated by his desire to enhance the success of the corporation.
(C) The chairman is innocent of any criminal offense.
(D) The corporation has expanded steadily over the past six years.
(E) Any legal proceedings against the chairman have resulted in his acquittal.


I understand why B is the answer...but...isn't A also kind of like the answer? Because in the passage, it says " Individuals seeking to control the corporation for their own purposes have demanded my resignation" ......?


答案不是D嗎?
原文說想要掌控公司的人都要求他離職
A是說要求他離職的都是想掌控公司的
就像是[下雨-->地濕]
但不能推得[地濕-->下雨]呀
有可能是有人潑水才地濕
相對的也有可能別人因為其他因素要他離職一樣
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章littlepeony » 2005-12-21 21:53

我想問的是C耶....
原文不是說 "Remember that no court of law in any state has found me guilty of any criminal offense whatsoever. In the American tradition, as you know, an individual is considered innocent until proven guilty."
如此不能推得C嗎???
未來只能更堅強!!
頭像
littlepeony
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 27
註冊時間: 2005-09-25 20:23

[問題]大全B-1

文章Ajinaruto » 2006-01-15 02:19

答案C應該是個超出文章範圍的答案
他只說在法律之前,任何人在被判定有罪之前都應該視為清白的
但不表示他真的無罪.
因此從文章內容並無法得知他到底是不是清白的.
能受天磨方硬漢,不遭人忌是庸才
頭像
Ajinaruto
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 44
註冊時間: 2005-10-03 01:37
來自: 21世紀

文章dibert8 » 2007-04-27 10:33

閱讀!拿出閱讀的技巧... 考 infer => 答案就是文章裡沒有的
(A) 文章裡有
(B) 文章裡沒有, 但意思有點到: 1. criminal offense, 2. success
(C) 文章裡有
(D) 文章裡有
(E) 無關
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 3 位訪客