Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - GWD 2 Q10

GWD 2 Q10

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD 2 Q10

帖子xenophen » 2005-03-08 22:55

Question 10:
Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

A.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C.Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D.Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it
E.Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

這題答案是B
我覺得B和E都不錯 後來選了B
不過聽朋友說MBA8裡面附的答案是E...
想請問大家的看法~ 謝謝!

呵呵 不好意思
第一次發問就連問了三題 ;-$
头像
xenophen
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 26
注册: 2005-01-15 01:17

帖子liwuu » 2005-03-09 00:03

我投B一票...需要進一步討論的話,再討論囉!!
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
头像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 1639
注册: 2004-11-17 06:02

Re: GWD 2 Q10

帖子adonais » 2005-03-09 01:58

xenophen \$m[1]:Question 10:
Environmentalist: The use of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville creates unacceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.

Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.

Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.

Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

A.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C.Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D.Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting the environmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it
E.Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

這題答案是B
我覺得B和E都不錯 後來選了B
不過聽朋友說MBA8裡面附的答案是E...
想請問大家的看法~ 謝謝!

呵呵 不好意思
第一次發問就連問了三題 ;-$


我也選B, Environmentalist 是直接challenge spokesperson的 assumption,也就是根本沒人會到Milville, E選項並非Environmentalist的原意, 因為似乎某部分暗示了還是有人到Milville, 只是該benefit的人卻沒被benefit到,此與原意不合
個人淺見, 請參考 :PP
头像
adonais
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 20
注册: 2005-03-05 01:43
地址: Taipei

帖子xenophen » 2005-03-11 14:04

adonais看了你的說明之後
覺得比較清楚了~謝謝喔
头像
xenophen
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 26
注册: 2005-01-15 01:17

帖子曾小小 » 2005-05-02 22:51

這題的b選項我覺得有個問題
is outweighed by用的是被動式
所以這個選項的意思變成
環境學家挑戰一個假設
這個假設是說 不良結果會重於好的結果

這樣不是和意思相反了嗎
曾小小
新手會員
新手會員
 
帖子: 8
注册: 2005-02-17 23:32
地址: 台大國企

帖子freshmanduke » 2005-05-04 17:05

I support E
如果選b 則代表 作者覺得Milville business spokesperson說的advantage是存在的
也就是說當地居民是可以benefit from many out-of-towners 所帶來的利益
只不過 disadvantage outweight advantage
故b is not the proper answer.
相反的 e 就很清楚的解釋 當地居民不可能benefit from it 因為遊客stop coming here because of noise and pollution it produced.
头像
freshmanduke
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 245
注册: 2005-02-24 21:46
地址: 台南人

帖子JS » 2005-05-04 17:19

I think the answer is E.
B is wrong if you read it carefully, it actually saying the desireable outcome ( g8 financial benefit) is outweighted by negative aspects ( noise and pollution). But the environmentalist in fact states the opposit.
JS
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 81
注册: 2005-04-07 16:39
地址: London

帖子sleek » 2005-08-28 12:28

曾小小 \$m[1]:這題的b選項我覺得有個問題
is outweighed by用的是被動式
所以這個選項的意思變成
環境學家挑戰一個假設
這個假設是說 不良結果會重於好的結果

這樣不是和意思相反了嗎


I support E

Totally agree with your argument~
sleek
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 146
注册: 2005-02-20 22:32

帖子lunar916 » 2005-10-09 11:49

Q:
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville....
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from...

(e) Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

一開始是說snowmobiling會增進來snowmobiling的人
後來是在說來cross-country ski的人
這是兩組不同的人阿
passage又沒說來snowmobiling 的跟來cross-country ski的是一樣的人
所以我覺得E不對
头像
lunar916
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 415
注册: 2005-07-01 13:56

帖子fiona » 2005-10-13 15:04

many out-of-towners 會來
A great many cross-country skiers 本來會來現在不會來
也許就算不是同一群人 也可以用來削弱BUSINESSMAN的說法
头像
fiona
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 344
注册: 2005-05-27 08:36

帖子meefoo » 2005-10-14 17:12

我想問個問題... 不知道會不會很笨...
我搞不太清楚B和D的否定點在哪,問題如下:
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
藍色that...部分是指這個被challenge的assumption? 還是說明challenge的原因?
E.Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people
藍色that...部分是指這個被deny的effect? 還是說明deny的原因?

麻煩各位大大解惑... ><
meefoo
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 49
注册: 2005-09-29 16:15

帖子維尼 » 2005-10-14 17:30

meefoo \$m[1]:我想問個問題... 不知道會不會很笨...
我搞不太清楚B和D的否定點在哪,問題如下:
B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
藍色that...部分是指這個被challenge的assumption? 還是說明challenge的原因?
E.Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people
藍色that...部分是指這個被deny的effect? 還是說明deny的原因?

麻煩各位大大解惑... ><


你的問題一點都不笨
而且我覺得是解題的重點耶!
那兩個選項的that可以說是前面那個名詞的同位語
說明that之前那個名詞的詳細內容 就像sc裡面常有的 the evidence that
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
头像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1194
注册: 2005-02-21 17:41

帖子chenfruit » 2005-10-15 04:02

我拿到的答案都是E
咖啡店的更新答案跟CD上攜隱的CR總整理答案都是E

這題又在考閱讀 ...

我的理解
環境學家: A事實會造成 B缺點
生意人 : A事實也會造成C優點 ,所以我們要忍受B缺點
環境學家 : A事實反而會因為B缺點根本不會產生所謂的C優點

題目問說,環境學家如何反駁?

B選項 看清楚文意 B選項所言的假設是弊大於利,
因為那個B所謂的假設就是環境學家本身的看法
環境學家應該是 claiming the assumption
(..但就算是換成claim也不是答案,題目問你如何反駁)


E選項 否認A事實能夠真正使某些人有利可圖
然而生意人說A事實已經讓某些人有利可圖 -->這句很機車超不順口
头像
chenfruit
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 54
注册: 2005-06-15 07:25
地址: 台南的好地方

帖子林小馬 » 2005-10-15 09:45

lunar916 \$m[1]:Q:
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville....
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from...

(e) Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

一開始是說snowmobiling會增進來snowmobiling的人
後來是在說來cross-country ski的人
這是兩組不同的人阿
passage又沒說來snowmobiling 的跟來cross-country ski的是一樣的人
所以我覺得E不對


我想those people就是a certain group of people喔
是同一群人,否則不能用those
這群人是誰呢? 其實是local residents啊

Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
雖然他們是在講其他城市的人來,或是國外的人來
不過重點都是看怎樣才能benefit local residents囉
我猜是這樣吧
供參考囉
林小馬
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 367
注册: 2005-08-23 20:58
地址: Taiwan

帖子winihsi » 2005-12-13 16:44

B絕對是錯的

B.Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome

重點是在於
A is outweighed by B
winihsi
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 29
注册: 2005-07-23 12:19

下一页

回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 3 位游客