Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題][問題]請問一下GWD龍變鳥的那篇是在哪裡呀?←開頭請加注

[問題][問題]請問一下GWD龍變鳥的那篇是在哪裡呀?←開頭請加注

二戰和多戰考友探討經驗教訓, 專業分析考生備考誤區, 機經, 臨考叮嚀

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題][問題]請問一下GWD龍變鳥的那篇是在哪裡呀?←開頭請加注

文章davidslin » 2005-10-21 11:40

剛在看九月的機經,發現有一篇龍變鳥的蠻常出的,而且是在GWD中
,可是我印象中GWD中提到恐龍的好像只有討論是溫血還是冷血的那篇,想請問各位那是GWD的那篇呀?
謝謝
大全裡好像有一篇是龍變鳥的,不知道是不是那篇 :^)
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章chihhan123 » 2005-10-21 11:59

恐龍溫血/冷血
拿鳥類、爬蟲類的骨頭做比較
GWD 9-Q33~36

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3533

請參考
頭像
chihhan123
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 97
註冊時間: 2005-09-14 18:42

文章davidslin » 2005-10-21 12:23

chihhan123 \$m[1]:恐龍溫血/冷血
拿鳥類、爬蟲類的骨頭做比較
GWD 9-Q33~36

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3533

請參考



喔喔 不好意思 剛剛去看了一下04年10月的機經 應該是這篇
9月JJ36條
3. 關于某種鳥是否由恐龍是進化過來:
整個文章一段,35行左右,比較簡單。儘管有證據顯示某種鳥是由恐龍進化來的,但是仍然有很多人對鳥由恐龍進化來,表示質疑.
有一種觀點認為︰發現的這種鳥的化石早于發現的恐龍的化石,(這裡有具體舉發現的化石的例子;后面有題目問這些例子的作用)所以不可能由恐龍進化鳥。作者反駁說,也許有的化石還沒有發現,沒發現就不能否定恐龍轉化為鳥。接著(also)有人人為︰這中鳥的某部分(大概是翅膀)和恐龍不一樣。作者反駁說,沒具體的證據,也不能這么說。
finally, some scientists說︰鳥的肺和恐龍不一樣,作者也反駁了。

補充一下,這篇是閱讀大全裡的喔 :smile
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章chihhan123 » 2005-10-21 12:59

davidslin \$m[1]:
chihhan123 \$m[1]:恐龍溫血/冷血
拿鳥類、爬蟲類的骨頭做比較
GWD 9-Q33~36

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=3533

請參考



喔喔 不好意思 剛剛去看了一下04年10月的機經 應該是這篇
9月JJ36條
3. 關于某種鳥是否由恐龍是進化過來:
整個文章一段,35行左右,比較簡單。儘管有證據顯示某種鳥是由恐龍進化來的,但是仍然有很多人對鳥由恐龍進化來,表示質疑.
有一種觀點認為︰發現的這種鳥的化石早于發現的恐龍的化石,(這裡有具體舉發現的化石的例子;后面有題目問這些例子的作用)所以不可能由恐龍進化鳥。作者反駁說,也許有的化石還沒有發現,沒發現就不能否定恐龍轉化為鳥。接著(also)有人人為︰這中鳥的某部分(大概是翅膀)和恐龍不一樣。作者反駁說,沒具體的證據,也不能這么說。
finally, some scientists說︰鳥的肺和恐龍不一樣,作者也反駁了。

補充一下,這篇是閱讀大全裡的喔 :smile


感謝...那是否可以給一下連結....感恩感恩..
頭像
chihhan123
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 97
註冊時間: 2005-09-14 18:42

文章davidslin » 2005-10-21 15:00

davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章chihhan123 » 2005-10-21 22:20

感謝您的指導!!! 謝謝!
頭像
chihhan123
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 97
註冊時間: 2005-09-14 18:42

文章davidslin » 2005-10-23 19:36

chihhan123 \$m[1]:感謝您的指導!!! 謝謝!


不好意思,後來複習到天山,發現應該是天山第四回這篇
Q5 to Q7:
Although many lines of evidence indicate
that birds evolved from ground-dwelling
theropod dinosaurs, some scientists remain
Line unconvinced. They argue that theropods
(5) appeared too late to have given rise to birds,
15
noting that Archaeopteryx lithographica—the
oldest known bird—appears in the fossil
record about 150 million years ago, whereas
the fossil remains of various nonavian
(10) maniraptor theropods—the closest known
relatives of birds—date only to about 115
million years ago. But investigators have
now uncovered bones that evidently belong
to nonavian maniraptors dating to the time of
(15) Archaeopteryx. In any case, failure to find
fossils of a predicted kind does not rule out
their existence in an undiscovered deposit.
Skeptics also argue that the fused clavicles
(the “wishbone”) of birds differ from the
(20) unfused clavicles of theropods. This
objection was reasonable when only early
theropod clavicles had been discovered,
but fossilized theropod clavicles that look
just like the wishbone of Archaeopteryx
(25) have now been unearthed. Finally, some
scientists argue that the complex lungs of
birds could not have evolved from theropod
lungs, an assertion that cannot be supported
or falsified at the moment, because no fossil
(30) lungs are preserved in the paleontological
record.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q5:
The primary purpose of the passage is to
A. compare the development of two hypotheses concerning the evolutionary origin
of birds
B. suggest revisions to the standard theory of the evolutionary history of birds
C. evaluate the usefulness of fossil evidence in determining the evolutionary history
of birds
D. challenge the theory that birds evolved from ground-dwelling theropod dinosaurs
E. respond to criticisms of the theory that birds evolved from ground-dwelling
theropod dinosaurs
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q6:
In the context of the passage, the phrase “fossils of a predicted kind” (line 16) most likely
refers to which of the following?
A. Theropod fossils with fused clavicles
B. Theropod fossils that are similar in structure to Archaeopteryx fossils
16
C. Theropod fossils dating back more than 150 million years
D. Fossils indicating the structure of theropod lungs
E. Fossils indicating the structure of Archaeopteryx lungs
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q7:
Which of the following is mentioned in the passage as an argument made by scientists
who are unconvinced that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs?
A. There are no known theropod dinosaur fossils dating from a period after the time
of Archaeopteryx.
B. There are no known theropod dinosaur fossils that indicate the structure of those
dinosaurs’ lungs.
C. Theropod dinosaurs appear in the fossil record about 150 million years ago.
D. Theropod dinosaurs did not have fused clavicles.
E. Theropod dinosaurs had certain bones that look just like those of Archaeopteryx.
Answer:

;-$
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市


回到 GMAT 機經分享 / 考試心得經驗談

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 10 位訪客