GWD24-17

由 **vivid** » 2004-12-20 17:42

The yield of natural gas from Norway’s Troil gas field is expected to increase annually until the year 2005 and then to stabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extraction rate at least for 50 years’ production.

A) 2005 and then to stabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extraction rate at least for
B) 2005 and then to stabilize at six billion cubic feet a day, an extraction rate that will allow at least
C) 2005 and then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, with such an extraction rate at the least allowing
D) 2005, then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, allowing such an extraction rate for at least
E) 2005, then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, which will allow such an extraction rate for at least

答案是b
請問a錯在哪裡
是因為which指代不清嗎
還有at least 後面加介詞for 是錯的嗎
我感覺好像是
但說不出為什麼
謝謝大家

網站 · 由 **agk99** » 2004-12-20 18:02

你講的都對呀，選B就是符合同位語使用規則，同時也排除你說的兩項缺點

由 **vivid** » 2004-12-21 01:10

多謝指點^^

由 **Janet** » 2005-10-14 18:20

我想請問D錯在哪邊?

D) 2005, then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, allowing such an extraction rate for at least

也是for出了問題嗎? 因為我不覺得' then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day'這邊有什麼問題! 可把它看成省略主詞與連接詞,改成分詞.

請解惑!

由 **vivid** » 2005-10-14 20:20

有個模糊的印象
如果有 and then.....
不能將and省略加逗號獨留then在那邊
不過我也是隱約記得
如果錯了請大家用力指正我謝謝

由 **cynthiachan** » 2005-10-26 16:50

vivid \$m[1]:有個模糊的印象
如果有 and then.....
不能將and省略加逗號獨留then在那邊
不過我也是隱約記得
如果錯了請大家用力指正我謝謝

除此之外個人覺得
allowing such an extraction rate ofr at least
是由形容詞子句化簡而來的，所以也不知道allowing 修飾哪一個

由 **step by step** » 2005-10-30 15:40

(D)錯誤如下:
1.同vivid的說法，莫老師提過and then為連體嬰，必須同時去掉，或同時存在
2.allowing的subject不明確，分析如下:
a.若allowing為省略連接詞而來，則subject為The yield of natural...gas field，如此一來such an extraction rate不知道只的是什麼rate，句意不明
b.若allowing非省略連接詞而來，則修飾的對象為The yield of natural..the year 2005，同樣地such an extraction rate還是不知道只的是什麼rate，句意不明

由 **whoops** » 2007-05-15 22:41

還有at least 後面加介詞for 是錯的嗎
我感覺好像是
但說不出為什麼

想問一下
at least + for的問題在哪?
麻煩哪位大大回答

由 **dibert8** » 2007-05-19 01:30

我覺得是 for at least 50 years’ production 比較好

由 **dibert8** » 2007-05-19 01:36

Janet \$m[1]:我想請問D錯在哪邊?

D) 2005, then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day, allowing such an extraction rate for at least

也是for出了問題嗎? 因為我不覺得' then stabilizing at six billion cubic feet a day'這邊有什麼問題! 可把它看成省略主詞與連接詞,改成分詞.

請解惑!

stabilizing 的主詞是 yield ,這樣句意就不合理囉!

GWD24-17

GWD24-17

Re: GWD24-17

誰在線上