Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]GWD 9-26

[問題]GWD 9-26

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GWD 9-26

文章FionaV » 2005-11-06 17:43

GWD 9-26

Growing evidence that coastal erosion occur continuously, not in just such calamitous bursts like hurricanes, has led scientists
and planners to urge a stringent new approach to limiting development along the nation's shoreline.

A. coastal erosion occurs continuously, not in just such calamitous bursts like hurricanes, has
B. coastal erosion occurs continuously, not just in calamitous bursts such as hurricanes, has
C. coastal erosion is continuously occurring, not in just calamitous bursts like hurricanes, having
D. there is continuous coastal erosion, not just in calamitous bursts such as hurricanes, which has
E. there is continuous coastal erosion occurring, not in just such calamitous bursts like hurricanes, has

Ans: B

A為什麼是錯的呢?
還有,"not in just" 和 "not just in" 有什麼差別呢?
FionaV
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-09-16 03:40

文章維尼 » 2005-11-06 18:19

1. such AS but not such LIKE

2. just 是副詞 所以根據句意just應該是用來修飾 in ... 這個片語
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章michelle610 » 2005-11-06 18:27

本題考點:
1.主動詞一致
2.such as VS like
3.not in just VS not just in(not in just查了字典 沒看到這樣的用法 而not just in 應該是指"並非是";詳細說明參考樓上的維尼大人)

A.在ETS考試中 用來舉例通常會用"such as"而非"like"

B.正確答案

C.這樣主要子句就沒有動詞
是such as 而非 like

D.there is是虛詞且用在這裡太囉唆
主要子句沒有動詞

E.there is是虛詞且用在這裡太囉唆
是such as 而非 like
主要子句沒有動詞且that子句有兩個動詞

維尼大大 小女子班門前弄斧 有錯還請指教 可別笑我阿!!! :PP
背靠傳統 才知道未來該往哪裡去
頭像
michelle610
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 320
註冊時間: 2005-03-21 09:33

文章維尼 » 2005-11-06 18:35

To michelle610

妳太客氣了啦~
大家都是貢獻自己想法 何來班門弄斧之說
而且妳不但分析考點 還仔細地寫出每個答案的錯
厲害唷! ;yes;
MBA Class of 2009, UCLA Anderson School of Management

With this faith, we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. -- "I Have a Dream", Martin Luther King, Jr.
頭像
維尼
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1194
註冊時間: 2005-02-21 17:41

文章michelle610 » 2005-11-06 18:50

多謝維尼大的鼓勵 我還需要再接再厲啦!!!
背靠傳統 才知道未來該往哪裡去
頭像
michelle610
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 320
註冊時間: 2005-03-21 09:33

文章SL320 » 2005-12-12 01:23

請問,依莫老師的說法,
like + N,
Such as S + V, 這樣的話,B不是不好嗎??謝謝!!
SL320
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 31
註冊時間: 2005-11-14 20:09

文章 » 2005-12-12 10:51

莫老師應該是說
like+N
as+ S V

such as舉例用;like比較用
我行,就任我行 !
頭像
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 204
註冊時間: 2005-05-19 14:42
來自: Mars


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客

cron