GWD10-17

[agk99]

GWD-10-Q17:Boldface
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.




答案給B

但d e呢?

[micht]

GWD-10-Q17:Boldface
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?


D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.




答案給B

但d e呢?

d錯, 1st bold-face is correct but the 2nd bold-face is incorrect 因為二句是反對 第一句 怎麼會變成support哩

e 錯, 因為second bold-face不是evidence.......

[myron]

GWD-10-Q17:Boldface
Editorial:
An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander’s approval should no longer be required since the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second acknowledges a potential objection against that recommendation.
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the editorial.
D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.
E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.




答案給B

題目看的霧撒撒....那位高手可幫忙解釋藍色字部分的意思嗎?

[Calvin]

某個政府專家發現所有臨時性（尚未完成法定程序）的逮捕行為都可以符合watch commanders所加強要求的証據適法性的標準。（對逮捕程序不太了解，僅從個人理解範圍內翻釋）

FYI

[myron]

某個政府專家發現所有臨時性（尚未完成法定程序）的逮捕行為都可以符合watch commanders所加強要求的証據適法性的標準。（對逮捕程序不太了解，僅從個人理解範圍內翻釋）

FYI

calvin 兄,
多謝啦,常常勞駕你幫忙,
我覺得有些CR的題目真的是很繞,
甚至比RC的還難讀懂.

[Calvin]

myron

別客氣啦…舉手之勞而己！

CR就是小閱讀喔！若對題意理解上常常覺得有困難，不妨多花點時間在SC及RC上。

加油加油

[cyi1978]

還可以對照下面這題：

我是在 Too Too 版 GWD 第24組裡頭看到了，第17題

Editorial:

An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency expert has observed that almost all provisional arrests meet the standards for adequacy of evidence that the watch commanders enforce. The expert has therefore recommended that because the officers’ time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted, the watch commander’s approval no longer be required. This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous, however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders’ standards will continue to be observed once approval is longer required.

In the editorial, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A). The first is a claim, the accuracy of which is disputed by the editorial; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the editorial.
(B).The first is an observation that the editorial disputes; the second is a conclusion that was drawn from that observation.
(C).The first is a finding that was used in support of a proposal that the editorial opposes; the second is a judgment that was based on that finding and in turn was used to support the proposal.
(D).The first is a finding introduced to support the main conclusion of the editorial; the second is that main conclusion.
(E).The first is a conclusion, the evidence for which the editorial evaluates; the second is part of the evidence cited in favor of that conclusion.

答案是：(C)

[Huang Hsin-Yi]

B的選項看了很暈,那位大大可以解釋一下

[amazingslim]

B的選項看了很暈,那位大大可以解釋一下

GWD-10-Q17:Boldface
B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.
第1句:專家提出建議是跟社論相反的
第2句:社論對關於該建議的判斷(反駁建議)