Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - gwd24-Q22

gwd24-Q22

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

gwd24-Q22

文章u9069700 » 2004-11-17 22:47

24-22 Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A) Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.
B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
D) The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E) Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.
答案是B 請問為什麼呢
看不出來阿
加油!加油
打敗ETS-------------
頭像
u9069700
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 52
註冊時間: 2004-11-08 20:34

文章micht » 2004-11-18 07:41

conclusion:
a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

follow-up x-ray =waste of money

(B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.



B 支持, 證明第一次的x-ray檢察又足以判斷 會不會有fracture of the ankle. 所以就不需要再浪費再做一次複診..x-ray檢查, 也就證明 再做一次x-ray檢查 的確是waste of money, because the result will be most likely the same as the initial result.
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

文章u9069700 » 2004-11-18 19:50

喔喔~~~醬就很清楚囉~
謝謝!!!!
好快就得到回覆呢
真棒....
加油!加油
打敗ETS-------------
頭像
u9069700
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 52
註冊時間: 2004-11-08 20:34

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章DARY » 2005-04-19 01:28

u9069700 \$m[1]:24-22 Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A) Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.
B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
D) The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E) Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.
答案是B 請問為什麼呢
看不出來阿


雖然答案選(B)是比較好,但總覺得怪怪的
題目是在討論patients with ankle fractures需不需要做follow-up x-ray
而(B)中卻是在討論patients with ankle injures是不是involve ankle injures

我的想法是:將題目的patient with ankle fractures改成injures
受傷=> initial x-ray => 正確的分辨fracture or not => doesn't need follow-up x-ray
提供大家討論
頭像
DARY
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 108
註冊時間: 2004-11-30 17:22

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章soami » 2005-05-06 17:07

u9069700 \$m[1]:24-22 Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture. When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A) Doctors who are general practitioners rather than orthopedists are less likely than orthopedists to judge the stability of an ankle fracture correctly.
B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
D) The healing of ankle fractures that have been surgically repaired is always checked by means of a follow-up x-ray.
E) Orthopedists routinely order follow-up x-rays for fractures of bone other than ankle bones.
答案是B 請問為什麼呢
看不出來阿


翻了一下CD上面這題的討論 B、C都有人支持沒有定論。

B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
先說B我有二個想法。
1.不好的地方我覺得是這個字 ,沒有完全排除失診的可能性。
另外一個想法
2.題目說到所有骨折只要診斷是stable,就不需要follow-up X rays,那現在初次診斷結果是not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
連骨折都沒有,當然不用作第二次檢查啦。進而支持結論。


C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

這個選項我覺得的有點無關,但是又好像對。

誰能釐清一下我的觀念。
lol
頭像
soami
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 83
註冊時間: 2004-12-16 00:49

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章世界和平 » 2005-08-18 10:11

soami \$m[1]:
翻了一下CD上面這題的討論 B、C都有人支持沒有定論。

B) Many ankle injuries for which an initial x-ray is ordered are revealed by the x-ray not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
先說B我有二個想法。
1.不好的地方我覺得是這個字 ,沒有完全排除失診的可能性。
另外一個想法
2.題目說到所有骨折只要診斷是stable,就不需要follow-up X rays,那現在初次診斷結果是not to involve any fracture of the ankle.
連骨折都沒有,當然不用作第二次檢查啦。進而支持結論。


C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

這個選項我覺得的有點無關,但是又好像對。

誰能釐清一下我的觀念。


Dear soami,

C選項就如同您所說,是無關選項。因為只提到很多人會review x-ray,完全未提到任何是否需要x-ray的資訊。所以是無關選項。

歡迎討論。
Babson College
MBA Class of 2009

"Life is not a matter of holding good cards but of playing a poor hand well"
Robert L. Stevenson (1850~1894, The author of “Treasure Island”)
頭像
世界和平
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 191
註冊時間: 2005-03-21 22:10
來自: Taipei

文章evelight » 2005-08-23 00:02

同意樓上。
Crystal Wu
Georgetown MBA of 2008
頭像
evelight
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 421
註冊時間: 2005-01-01 04:16

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章林小馬 » 2005-09-22 11:04

我支持C喔

先說否定B的原因
題目上說
Often patients with ankle fractures that are stable, and thus do not require surgery, are given follow-up x-ray because their orthopedists are concerned about possibly having misjudged the stability of the fracture.
已經是鎖定在ankle有fracture的人身上了
(只是看要不要做follow-up x-ray)
而B選項說
有ankle injury的人很多照了initial x-ray後沒有fracture
這是沒關的
我的理解是
有ankle injury的人 都會去照initial x-ray判定有沒有fracture
沒有fracture的人-->B
有fracture的人-->題幹, 去繼續做follow up x-ray

不管有ankle injury的人照了initial x-ray後有超級無敵高的比例沒有fracture, 但題幹上討論的還是那群有fracture的人

選擇C的原因是
題目上說
When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
今天作者憑什麼說follow-up x-ray浪費
是憑著有個review說follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow
所以要strengthen這個argument
就要去strengthen這個review的可信度
這就跟莫杯杯教我們寫argument時可以去質疑統計數字來源是一樣的


C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
它是說在這個review中
是根據很多不同醫院不同醫生的結果做出來的
所以是沒有偏頗的 是據代表性的
不是指根據一兩個醫生或一兩家醫院
所以根據這個review推得的結論是可行的
林小馬
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 367
註冊時間: 2005-08-23 20:58
來自: Taiwan

文章yaokk » 2005-11-04 21:09

同意C。
理由同小馬,要做follow-up x-ray的人,已經先被醫師判斷過他是屬於有fracture,但還算stable,所以才不用動手術治療。
B選項說,受傷的人來照x-ray,發現沒有fracture,那跟題目中說有照x-ray的人不一樣哩!
C說很多醫生、醫院都有做這樣的處理,而他們的數字也都被拿出來review。那就對啦!
yaokk
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 31
註冊時間: 2005-09-09 20:57

文章sophiechen » 2005-11-09 23:44

我第一眼看到b選項時
反而覺得會weaken
原因是
明明有受傷
第一次照卻看不到fracture
這不就有點表示
只看一次可能判斷錯誤嗎

不過b怎麼講
其討論的都與原題不太相干
sophiechen
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 759
註冊時間: 2005-07-11 21:26

文章stilalala » 2005-11-15 19:08

雖然這題一開始也做錯
選到個超級無官選項e去了
但仔細看了一次題目

覺得b跟題目焦點完全不同
應該是無關吧

支持小馬大大的意見
我選c :laugh
stilalala
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 185
註冊時間: 2005-03-08 22:54

文章chocola » 2005-11-20 23:58

我也同意小馬哥的意見
因為B是說
"many ankle injuries"(受傷但是不等於"ankle fractures"喔)照了"initial x-ray"(第一次照,但是不知道有沒有骨折),都發現結果沒有骨折
可是題目的樣本是
"Patients with ankle fractures"(就是已經發現有骨折),才接著作"follow up x-ray"(因為已經有骨折,所以要作類似"追蹤"檢查),才發現原本的"骨折"為什麼stable勒?因為已經"healed"(完全痊癒了)

樣本就是不同的對象
另外我記得以前江璞老師說過
"many"只有在某定題目的"絕對"字眼可以用
例如:題目講到"any"一定怎樣怎樣
答案只要有"many"就可以推翻
但是其他題目這樣的樣本數似乎不足以代表全部

這是秋可拉我目前的解讀
提供大家參考
沒有刻意的掩飾,那就是真誠
沒有刻意的放鬆,那就是自在
沒有刻意的裝扮,那就是美麗
頭像
chocola
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 52
註冊時間: 2005-05-03 11:45

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章whoops » 2007-03-11 21:18

林小馬 \$m[1]:

選擇C的原因是
題目上說
When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the fractures that had initially been judged stable were found to have healed correctly. Therefore, it is a waste of money to order follow-up x-rays of ankle fracture initially judged stable.
今天作者憑什麼說follow-up x-ray浪費
是憑著有個review說follow-up的結果其實都很stable根本不用follow
所以要strengthen這個argument
就要去strengthen這個review的可信度
這就跟莫杯杯教我們寫argument時可以去質疑統計數字來源是一樣的


C) X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.
它是說在這個review中
是根據很多不同醫院不同醫生的結果做出來的
所以是沒有偏頗的 是據代表性的
不是指根據一兩個醫生或一兩家醫院
所以根據這個review推得的結論是可行的


但選項C的陳述是否只是restate文中這段話的內容?
...When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the ...
頭像
whoops
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 95
註冊時間: 2006-02-09 23:44

Re: gwd24-Q22

文章keane0727 » 2007-03-20 23:28

whoops \$m[1]:

但選項C的陳述是否只是restate文中這段話的內容?
...When number of follow-up x-rays were reviewed, however, all the ...


我懷疑題目number of有誤,應該是a number of或是numbers of

支持C,同意小馬
因為a number of無法表現出樣本是否俱有代表性,C答案是說樣本是大量且不偏頗的
keane0727
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 134
註冊時間: 2006-05-24 16:57

文章lucyyeh » 2007-09-11 20:25

我對於C選項的意思不是很清楚,
C.X-rays of patients of many different orthopedists working in several hospitals were reviewed.

這裡的X-rays是哪個階段的X-rays?
題目不是說不要follow up 的X-rays,可是C選的X-rays又沒說是什麼時候照的。然後were reviewed. review what? 如何判定這個review就可以不必再照了呢? 然後C 選的主詞不是X-rays嗎?怎麼會像樓上說的根據這個review....?
還是我理解有誤呢?
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 410
註冊時間: 2007-03-22 12:20

下一頁

回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 11 位訪客