Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - GWD 24-14

GWD 24-14

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

GWD 24-14

文章best555tw » 2005-05-01 11:16

24-14: In 1983 Argonia’s currency, the argon, underwent a reduction in value relative to the world’s strongest currencies. This reduction resulted in a significant increase in Argonia’s exports over 1982 levels. In 1987 a similar reduction in the value of the argon led to another increase in Argonia’s exports. Faced with the need to increase exports yet again, Argonia’s finance minister has proposed another reduction in the value of the argon.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the prediction that the finance minister’s plan will not result in a significant increase in Argonia’s exports next year?
A) The value of the argon rose sharply last year against the world’s strongest currencies.
B) In 1988 the argon lost a small amount of its value, and Argonians exports rose slightly in 1989.
C) The value of Argonia’s exports was lower last year than it was the year before.
D) All of Argonia’s export products are made by factories that were operating at full capacity last year, and new factories would take years to build.
E) Reductions in the value of the argon have almost always led to significant reductions in the amount of goods and services that Argonians purchase from abroad.

題目最後一句不太能理解
Faced with the need to increase exports yet again, Argonia’s finance minister has proposed another reduction in the value of the argon.
minister到底是支持還是反對reductiuon
為什麼他還要proposed another reduction
如果反對他應該要避免redution而不是proposed another reduction
然後問題又說他的計畫will not result in a significant increase
那不就表示他反對嗎
搞不懂題目說他還要proposed another reduction????

誰來幫幫我.......
best555tw
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 430
註冊時間: 2005-03-26 21:13
來自: Taipei

文章Calvin » 2005-05-01 12:41

題目就是說第一波貨幣眨值帶來的出口增加還不足以符合期望,所以財政部長想要讓幣值再往下降,以創造更多的出口

找weaken說財政部長醬做是不會成功的

FYI
有一些無聲的話語,只有尋夢的人,彼此才聽得懂
頭像
Calvin
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1155
註冊時間: 2004-12-28 02:46

文章evelight » 2005-08-22 23:41

本題答案是D
其他ABCE不是不相干就是支持

那D又為什麼對呢?
看起來也很像是不相干的選項
嗯...我好像哪裡沒想通
Crystal Wu
Georgetown MBA of 2008
頭像
evelight
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 421
註冊時間: 2005-01-01 04:16

文章davidslin » 2005-09-27 17:41

evelight \$m[1]:本題答案是D
其他ABCE不是不相干就是支持

那D又為什麼對呢?
看起來也很像是不相干的選項
嗯...我好像哪裡沒想通


因為D是用他因來weaken,所以看起來好像跟題目沒有直接關係
雖然貨幣貶值可以增加出口,可是要是國內沒有能力再增加產量
就算人家要多買,也沒有多的東西可賣,就是D的意思囉
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章BECKY » 2005-11-16 06:02

喔.~~
終於看懂了....^^
BECKY
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 51
註冊時間: 2005-09-20 07:43


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 2 位訪客