Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]OG141

[問題]OG141

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG141

文章oliverfan » 2004-11-23 00:19

166. Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same, all patients receiving hearts or other organs must take antirejection drugs for the rest of their lives.

(A) Unlike transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same
(B) Besides transplants involving identical twins with the same genetic endowment
(C) Unless the transplant invoves identical twins who have the same genetic endowment
(D) Aside from a transplant between identical twins with the same genetic endowment
(E) Other than transplants between identical twins, whose genetic endowment is the same
------------------------------------------------------------

我其實對答案(c)沒有疑問,只是在OG的解答中指出,B及D選項錯的原因如下:

In B and D the expression identical twins with the same genetic endowment wrongly suggests that only some identical twin pairs are genetically identical

我的疑問是,在句意上

1) twins who have the same genetic endowment
2) twins with the same genetic endowment
3) twins whose genestic endowment is the same

有任何不同嗎?? 謝謝
頭像
oliverfan
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 9
註冊時間: 2004-11-23 00:05

文章Pufa » 2004-11-23 00:25

屋 終於有人問OG了~

1) twins who have the same genetic endowment
2) twins with the same genetic endowment
3) twins whose genestic endowment is the same
這些都是限定用法
暗指某些雙胞胎有同樣的基因 有些雙胞胎則有不同的基因
事實上,這裡應該用非限定用法(如同位語)來補充說明雙胞胎共有的特色
而不是用限定用法給了雙胞胎新的訊息

參考參考
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

Re: [問題]OG144

文章 » 2004-11-23 00:29

oliverfan \$m[1]:

1) twins who have the same genetic endowment
2) twins with the same genetic endowment
3) twins whose genestic endowment is the same

有任何不同嗎?? 謝謝



for (1) 言外之意==>存在 "沒有the same genetic endowment"的twins

for (2) 單純補充說明這些twins的特徵 "with the same genetic endowment"
並無討論(1)的絃外之音
單就您上述的句型排列而言 (2) (3) 的意思是相同的
:)
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

Re: [問題]OG144

文章micht » 2004-11-23 00:59

的確如此...

(2) imply there are some twins who have different genetic endowment ==> which is incorrect!!!

with....那相對的也就有 without嚕~~~? 我覺得~~~~

這於whose/who有沒有 我感覺並沒有如同(2)那樣imply~~~


個人感覺 請指點 8-)
圖檔圖檔圖檔
頭像
micht
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3276
註冊時間: 2004-09-27 12:13

Re: [問題]OG144

文章 » 2004-11-23 01:03

micht \$m[1]:的確如此...

(2) imply there are some twins who have different genetic endowment ==> which is incorrect!!!

with....那相對的也就有 without嚕~~~? 我覺得~~~~

這於whose/who有沒有 我感覺並沒有如同(2)那樣imply~~~


個人感覺 請指點 8-)



micht , (1)會有這種嫌外之意是因為牽涉到所謂 "關代" 限定與非限定用法的使用
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章訪客 » 2004-11-23 09:03

發文者也真的很厲害,標題的題號,跟文章中的題號不一樣就算了
回到oG去找題目,都找不到,原來是141題
你嘛幫幫忙
這題之前有討論過
我的想法跟魚一樣
不過whose關代可做限定嗎?
如果2跟3是一樣的話
這個概念我沒有,請於大補個充
OG141.
B,D=>with~做限定修飾,暗示只有一些identicla twins具有相同基因

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=735
另外昨天看到OG192裡的D選項也是用with~去修飾,OG的解釋還不錯,不過跟這題的非限定有沒關係,micht上次問的with用法可在這題找到答案,我沒時間就不把他找上來了
訪客
 


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客