Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]GWD17-01

[問題]GWD17-01

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]GWD17-01

文章jim9619 » 2005-11-29 19:54

Q1:
Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.

A.Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted
B.Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work that was rooted both
C.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, who produced a body of work rooted
D.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work that was rooted
E.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work rooted both

請問答案為什麼事D?
同位語不是要難懂的在前面,解釋的要在後面嗎
Jazz pianist and composer是用來解釋Thelonious Monk的
所以應該放在後面不是嗎
煩請高手牛人前輩解釋一下吧!!!
jim9619
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-06-23 23:28

文章jim9619 » 2005-12-02 14:46

........
jim9619
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-06-23 23:28

文章eggcake520 » 2005-12-02 16:52

Many rules you learn from class do not always right.
You will find many exceptional examples like this in your future preparation such as Tian-shan or GWD.
So, Don't focus on trival too seriously.
At my suggestion, asking some question by yourself is helpful to answer correctly.
Why choose the wrose answer?
Does the answer you choose is better than right answer?
What difference between them?

Good luck.
eggcake520
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 66
註冊時間: 2004-09-16 23:22

Re: [問題]GWD17-01

文章davidlee0222 » 2005-12-03 00:11

jim9619 \$m[1]:Q1:
Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington, yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.

A.Thelonious Monk, who was a jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work both rooted
B.Thelonious Monk, the jazz pianist and composer, produced a body of work that was rooted both
C.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, who produced a body of work rooted
D.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work that was rooted
E.Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk produced a body of work rooted both

請問答案為什麼事D?
同位語不是要難懂的在前面,解釋的要在後面嗎Jazz pianist and composer是用來解釋Thelonious Monk的
所以應該放在後面不是嗎
煩請高手牛人前輩解釋一下吧!!!

紅字部分完全喇叭
根本無此項規則

這題是句意難題
且是同位語高段考題
以及文法結構
有兩種解法

一是用同位語及文法結構
A鬥號後雖who was非慣用
直接用同位語可取代
但不表示錯

只能先用文法結構刪掉C
鬥號who不看
第一句沒動詞後面居然跟了個yet變流水句
DE無同位語無從比較
因此只成功刪掉一個C
留下四個選項選不出來

因此只能用第二種解法
句意
TM是兩種家
做了一系列作品
根源於WS跟DE兩人
後面blablabla不用看

忽然發現躲了一個字both
一系列作品是單數
為何會有both?
跟WS與DE兩人也無關
搞懂句意後發現是來魚目混珠
ABDE只有D沒有both
正解
davidlee0222
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 3017
註冊時間: 2004-12-14 19:54

文章jim9619 » 2005-12-04 21:33

感謝大衛的精闢講解....
果然還是句意為上!!
以後我會更加注意句意的問題
再次感謝~~~
jim9619
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 71
註冊時間: 2005-06-23 23:28

文章fsab00037748 » 2006-09-22 10:36

請問一下喔, 不是很大衛兄所講的
"只能先用文法結構刪掉C
鬥號who不看
第一句沒動詞後面居然跟了個yet變流水句"

mm...不是因為加了who連接詞,所以後面可以再跟第二個動詞嗎? ;-$
頭像
fsab00037748
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 156
註冊時間: 2006-02-17 13:30

文章eiswein » 2006-10-12 15:39

fsab00037748 \$m[1]:請問一下喔, 不是很大衛兄所講的
"只能先用文法結構刪掉C
鬥號who不看
第一句沒動詞後面居然跟了個yet變流水句"

mm...不是因為加了who連接詞,所以後面可以再跟第二個動詞嗎? ;-$


大衛兄的意思應該是指who開頭的那子句是非限定句可以跳過不讀,接下來就會看到yet帶出的子句,可是前面一個句子並沒有動詞阿,所以文法結構錯!

Jazz pianist and composer Thelonious Monk, [s]who produced a body of work rooted in the stride-piano tradition of Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington[/s], yet in many ways he stood apart from the mainstream jazz repertory.

以上~
頭像
eiswein
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 181
註冊時間: 2006-04-13 21:53
來自: Ann Arbor, Michigan

文章dibert8 » 2007-06-08 00:10

(A) both 雙向修飾,而且一本書也不能用 both
(B) the = 哪一個?
(C) 沒有動詞
(E) both 雙向修飾: ...a body of work {rooted both} in... => both 不能只有一本書;或者 ...a body of work rooted {both in...}
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章Frankts » 2007-06-25 21:26

看到這一題的both 讓我直覺想到both A and B
因此 去選項中看了一下 發現並沒有這個結構
(Willie (The Lion) Smith and Duke Ellington 這個and不是both A and B的and)
所以只剩下C和D來考慮
C選項中就如同大家所說 並沒有動詞 因此最後選D 以上
Frankts
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 135
註冊時間: 2006-02-09 21:56


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 9 位訪客