[問題]OG(11th)102

[oguz]

Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, capitalized on her keen obversation and love of the natural world.

(A) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives,
(B) In her book illustrations, carefully coordinating them with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(C) In her book illustrations, which she carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter
(D) Carefully coordinated with her narratives, Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
(E) Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations, carefully coordinated them with her narratives and
這題曾附屬在別題下討論過, 但與我問的問題無關, 所以又開了一個帖, 不知道可不可以?
Anyway, 我的問題只在(E)選項
根據OG11th的解釋, Them cannot refer to book illustrations because the plural noun is the object of the preposition in
我不懂為何它是the object of the preposition in, them 就不能指代他. 是根據句意判斷嗎? 翻成中文好像通又好像不通

[agk99]

In E, them can be refered to illustrations, or narratives.

[frozenrain]

(E) 的 in her book illustrations 是修飾 carefully coordinated them with her narratives 這句話還有 and 後面那句，擺回原順序的話：
Beatrix Potter carefully coordinated them with her narratives in her book illustrations and .... in her book illustrations.
這樣就會顯得更 unclear

OG 的解釋並沒有說不能指代吧，只是說這樣 unclear

[r123581]

我可以把(E) 的 in her book illustrations 當成插入語然後省略來看嗎？

Beatrix Potter(in her book illustrations) carefully coordinated them with her narratives and....
這樣them...就不知道要指誰了？ 所以錯

不過我有一個問題...
就是agk99 說的them 可以指向 後面的narratives

我怎麼記得，我做過某一題，就是在人名還沒出現前，不可以出現代名詞(抱歉一時想不起來)

請各位高手解救一下．．．謝謝

[souljuice]

人名出現前不能用代名詞指代這個人名應該沒有強制規定
如果說這個代名詞比人名早出現
但是這個人名是主句的主詞
那這個先出現的代名詞就可以優先指代後面主句的人名
因為代名詞優先指代主句主詞
這種情況下
代名詞不能早出現的情況就不存在了

[r123581]

瞭解了謝謝^^

[souljuice]

剛剛正好看到例子
OG10th 69題
一開頭的she指代後面的人名

[Emilyh]

D)Carefully coordinated with her narratives,Beatrix Potter, in her book illustrations
OG解釋:Carefully coordinated...absurdly modifies Beatrix Potter rather than book illustrations

請問，如果Carefully coordinated with her narratives應該修飾
her book illustrations ，那不是變成B選項的情況Potter, not the illustrations did the coordinating?

[Jen-Cheng]

是沒錯，但是B也同樣犯了， them 不可以指代介系詞的受詞，只有C
很巧妙的避開了這個問題

[steris]

是沒錯，但是B也同樣犯了， them 不可以指代介系詞的受詞，只有C
很巧妙的避開了這個問題

對不起 請問一下喔~
我不太懂為什麼 them 不可以指代介系詞的受詞耶...
就是選項 E 的解釋
可以麻煩高手指導一下嗎？
感激不盡~~

[stellaadixen]

頂一下.我也有相同的疑問.不知道版上可有人好心解答?

[hcgh]

把E還原，In her book illustrations, BP carefully coordinated them with her narratives...在她的插圖中，BP小心地調和他們(插圖)與故事。"BP小心地調和插圖與故事" 好像就很清楚了，加個"在她的插圖中"，就顯得畫蛇添足。如果一定要有前面那個介詞片語，也應該是 In her book，變成 "在她的書中，他小心地調和插圖與故事"，這樣的句意才是正確的。OG說不能指代原句仲介詞的受詞，應該就是這個意思吧！如果指代介詞的受詞，句意就會變得奇怪。

[dibert8]

(E)改變了句意
原具的重點在 B.P. capitalized on her keen... in her book illustrations; 關係子句或分詞構句旨在說明B.P.如何的運用他的keen...(配角);
把加油添醋修飾用的coordinate跟主角動詞capitalize用and對等起來,意思上並不一樣(原句的重點已失焦).
所以,不能用them去代替illustrations,而要用which起一個關係子句--功能跟coordinating引領的分詞構句相同(其實題目已經給了暗示).
由此, coordinating引領的分詞構句應放句首,才不致有修飾不清的問題(A)(B):
Carefully coordinating..., B.P., in her..., capitalized on her keen...
我覺得這題在考關係代名詞(which)vs代名詞(them): 前者只能代替在它之前的名詞,後者可代替在它之前或之後的名詞.
(D)的coordinated解為p.p.;被動, 講不通. 不選.

[dibert8]

, which 非限定用法:目的在補充資訊
them 代名詞:必有所指(限定)