Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - 大全140

大全140

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

大全140

文章liwuu » 2004-11-29 22:44

140.As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

答案是C...但是疑問的是for可以這樣用嗎?又請問D哪邊有誤呢?
頭像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 1639
註冊時間: 2004-11-17 06:02

文章Pufa » 2004-11-29 22:47

這裡的for意思等同於because。
但是用法稍有不同,for常在正式文書裡出現,而且只能放在句中,用逗點與主句相隔。
另外,because可以回答why問句,而for不行。
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

文章Pufa » 2004-11-29 23:38

D我認為有兩個錯誤
第一個錯誤是他改變了句意,除了讓原本的因果關係不見外,however的出現使句子多了轉折語氣。
另一個錯誤我不太確定,分詞的出現使得兩個句子完全獨立,they似乎不能指代到前面的families。

有人能回答我這個有關基本文法問題嗎 :-S
You get what you share
頭像
Pufa
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1477
註冊時間: 2004-10-25 17:37

文章蛙蛙 » 2005-07-11 18:00

1.再請問一下 B的since 不是也有"因為"的意思嗎?
B相對於C的缺點是什麼呢??


2.還有.... B選項的furthermore 不是翻譯成 "而且"
不是更加強解釋 為什麼 中產階級沒辦法買房子的原因嗎??

3. C 選項的yet 要怎麼翻譯比較好阿??

請教一下了 謝謝
蛙蛙
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 102
註冊時間: 2005-03-08 23:17

Re: 大全140

文章lightblue » 2005-07-11 18:42

liwuu \$m[1]:140.As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.
(A) and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes, and
(B) since these families can no longer afford to buy homes, furthermore
(C) for these families can no longer afford to buy homes, yet
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
(E) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes, for

答案是C...但是疑問的是for可以這樣用嗎?又請問D哪邊有誤呢?


試試看
這一題的B 如果furthmore 就是 run-on
從句意 有因果 所以 a d不選
e的語意奇怪

如果要翻 大概是
因為這些家庭無法買房子 上漲的租金反而要使他們付出比25%標準更多的收入去housing...

請指教
個人的看法 請大家不吝指教 :P
頭像
lightblue
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 57
註冊時間: 2005-03-03 23:37

文章vivid » 2005-09-13 16:59

詳解說however的出現使句子多了轉折語氣
但是正確答案的yet不也有轉折意思
請問兩者差別在哪
謝謝
vivid
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 92
註冊時間: 2004-11-11 02:41

文章wenlovying » 2005-10-05 18:00

詳解說however的出現使句子多了轉折語氣
但是正確答案的yet不也有轉折意思
請問兩者差別在哪
謝謝



d選 middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes and 不對 改 for才有因果 錯不在however吧
頭像
wenlovying
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 64
註冊時間: 2005-03-16 23:57

文章lunar916 » 2005-10-06 18:24

YET 沒有轉折嘛??
C的 yet 跟 D的 however 不是差不多的意思嘛???
頭像
lunar916
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 415
註冊時間: 2005-07-01 13:56

文章agustin » 2005-10-06 18:53

這題不簡單耶

首先 句意有因果關係 所以

A) ,and...
D) ,and...
E) ,and...

這三個刪去

B),C) ,for/since...表因為 有因果關係

然後看後面的yet/furthermore 都是副詞 寫法一樣 ,yet/ ,furthermore所以不是文法問題了

然後我查字典 yet=BUT 行文方向轉變了
furthermore= also/ in addition 行文方向一致

所以這是在考行文方向

[tab][tab]
頭像
agustin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 82
註冊時間: 2005-09-11 01:23

文章davidslin » 2005-10-06 20:23

wenlovying \$m[1]:
詳解說however的出現使句子多了轉折語氣
但是正確答案的yet不也有轉折意思
請問兩者差別在哪
謝謝



d選 middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and these families can no longer qualify to buy homes and 不對 改 for才有因果 錯不在however吧


我覺得是分號的問題,
(D) and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however,
分號使得前後句變成沒有關聯的兩句話,但實際上上漲的房租會影響中低收入戶家庭是因為他們沒有能力買房子的關係,因此D改變句意囉
davidslin
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 215
註冊時間: 2005-08-14 23:29
來自: 台北市

文章lunar916 » 2005-10-06 21:15

原來是這樣看

(As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit, and for these families can no longer afford to buy homes,)
yet
(rising rental rates force them to use far more than the standard 25 percent of their incomes for housing, leaving them with no equity or tax write-offs to offset the expenditures.)

yet跟furthermore和however比就不太一樣了
雖然我無法明確說出不一樣的地方....
頭像
lunar916
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 415
註冊時間: 2005-07-01 13:56

文章dibert8 » 2007-03-24 02:26

這樣看, 答案是 (C):
As the housing affordability gap widens, {middle-income families are especially hard-hit, for these families can no longer afford to buy homes,} yet rising rental rates force them to use ... .
如果是這樣看, 答案是 (D)?
{As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,} for these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however, rising rental rates force them to use ... .
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章dibert8 » 2007-03-24 02:30

更正:
如果這樣看, 答案是 (D)?
{As the housing affordability gap widens, middle-income families are especially hard-hit,} and these families can no longer afford to buy homes; however, rising rental rates force them to use ... .
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 6 位訪客