[問題]PP-test1-Q89~Q92 (listening) (已收錄)

[HCA]

89-92 Conversation about an Architecture Class
M: Interesting lecture today, didn’t you think?
W: Well, I suppose…. But I’ve never heard of the Bauhaus and I’m not clear on something. Was it some places you’d go to or was it more than a genre or movement some sort, you know like Brook impressionism.
M: No, it was actually a design school, located in Germany, founded by Walter Gropius. His goal was to combine technical skill and artistic talent and by doing this create a new form of architecture and applied arts.
W: Ok, so that explained what professor mentioned how strange people had studied with both a craft person and an artist.
M: Right. Before any body could actually begin their former training, they had to take workshops that were taught by both a craft person who emphasize technical expertise and an artist.
W: Interesting.
M: And the Bauhaus founders also departed from the notion of arts being of a form of a luxury object. They want to produce functional art to be enjoyed by everybody, not just the wealthy.
W: Were they making some sort of social statement?
M: Perhaps, I don’t know. But it didn’t mean that Bauhaus’ creation had their own artistic beauty and instead of being individually handcraft like something you see in a… I don’t know…Gothic Cathedral. They were produced by machines in large quantities.
W: Is the Bauhaus still around?
M: I don’t think so. But judging by the amount time on our class schedule that was going to be devoting to it, it’s a fact that must be left it.


92.What can be inferred from the conversation about the Bauhaus today? A: Its teachings are still influential.

答案是從哪一句看或聽出來的啊?

[Mocha]

我是從....

W: Is the Bauhaus still around?
M: I don’t think so. But judging by the amount time on our class schedule that was going to be devoting to it, it’s a fact that must be left it.

這裡聽出來的.....
根據M的說法，他們的課程花了一些時間都在講解the Bauhaus
所以我想多少還是對當今有影響吧...
要不然花那些時間介紹做啥 >"<
個人見解嚕...

[molecular]

W: Is the Bauhaus still around?
M: I don’t think so. But judging by the amount time on our class schedule that was going to be devoting to it, it’s a fact that must be left it.

請問最後這兩段對話的紅字部分是什麼意思呢? 謝謝

[molecular]

could someone help me? Thanks

[aaronmin]

W: Is the Bauhaus still around?

Bauhaus 如今還存在嗎？

M: I don't think so. But judging by the amount of time on our class schedule that we're going to be devoting to it, its effects must have outlived it.

這樣應該就了解囉。

[molecular]

aaronmin, 我已經有看過你在考試經驗分享裡面的分享文章了
可是我還是覺得很不可思議
你怎麼能把這些字都聽出來??
你寫說你幾乎都只有聽pp, 可是我覺得沒辦法到你這種功力耶!!
您是原本英文就很好嗎??
如果是的話, 我就不用在太苛責自己了
如果不是的話, 我真的很想知道你是怎麼辦到的耶!!

Thanks for your reply.

[aaronmin]

我的英文程度頂多只能算中上吧，談不上"很好"，但從小一直對英文保持興趣倒是真的。
這次準備聽力我雖然只有聽PP，而且認為足夠了是因為PP不管是在tone、pattern、structure、question等等，和正式考試幾乎都一模一樣了，所以才會覺得直攻PP是最有效的方法，許多前人的準備心得也大多把PP放在第一順位。
另外，因為準備的時間有限，所以我有補習，藉由補習班的進度逼自己唸書。老師上課也是用PP，講義就是所謂"補習班校正過的PP script"，其實對照網路上可供下載的各個script，就會發現補習班的也只是把網路上的做些修改，而且一樣錯誤很多，但只要大致不影響句意，其實無傷大雅。不過像這一題，script誤差就太大，會摸不著頭緒。
我在檢討PP時如果發現script有錯時就會試著訂正，因為為了想聽出錯誤，所以會更仔細去聽出每個字，加上連音的分析，幾次下來發覺還挺有趣的，雖然這樣挺花時間的，一篇talk大概要用掉一個小時，不過真的有感覺到進步。
如果有實在聽不懂的就來咖啡店看看前人是否已經討論過，或者和朋友討論，再對照各版本的script，大多可以發現端倪。

Nothing is impossible, just trust yourself, and you will make it!

[nexxt0722]

Conversation about an architecture class
M: Interesting lecture today, didn’t you think?
W: Well, I suppose…. But I’ve never heard of the Bauhaus and I’m not clear on something. Was it some places you’d go to or was it more than a genre or movement some sort, you know like Brook impressionism.
M: No, it was actually a design school, located in Germany, founded by Walter Gropius. His goal was to combine technical skill and artistic talent and by doing this create a new form of architecture and applied arts.
W: Ok, so that explained what professor mentioned how strange people had studied with both a craft person and an artist.
M: Right. Before any body could actually begin their former training, they had to take workshops that were taught by both a craft person who emphasize technical expertise and an artist.
W: Interesting.
M: And the Bauhaus founders also departed from the notion of arts being of a form of a luxury object. They want to produce functional art to be enjoyed by everybody, not just the wealthy.
W: Were they making some sort of social statement?
M: Perhaps, I don’t know. But it didn’t mean that Bauhaus’ creation had their own artistic beauty and instead of being individually handcraft like something you see in a… I don’t know…Gothic Cathedral. They were produced by machines in large quantities.
Is the Bauhaus still around? M: I don’t think so. But judging by the amount time on our class schedule that was going to be devoting to it, it’s a fact that must be left it.---> 本句是啥意思呢??
89. What is the talk mainly about?

A school of design
A famous architect
A group of German engineers
A machine used to help architects A

90. What was the philosophy of the founders of the
Bauhaus?

Designers should specialize in one particular skill
area.
Designers should study works from earlier
movements.
Design should be a blend of art and technology.
Design should be used for social criticism. C

91. Why was mass production important to Bauhaus
architects?

It demonstrated their ability to invent new machinery.
They were able to sell to markets outside of
Germany.
They could quickly establish themselves as major
artists.
It made their work accessible to people other than
the rich. D

為何本題91選D不選C
92. What can be inferred from the conversation about the
Bauhaus today?

Very few architects imitate its style.
Its teachings are still influential.
Its philosophy has been discredited.
It has relocated outside of Germany. B

有人能大概說一下此段的重點是啥嗎?
聽了幾次還不太能回答的出來