Which of the following hypotheses receives the strongest support from the information given?
a) The incidence of serious animal-induced allergies among current zoo employees is lower than that among the general population.
B) Zoo employees tend to develop animal-induced allergies that are more serious than those of other people who spend equally large amounts of time with animals.
c) Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal-induced allergy than is exposure to the kinds of animals that are kept in zoos
d) There is no occupation for which the risk of developing an animal-induced allergy is higher than 30 percent.
e) Among members of the general population who have spent as much time with animals as zoo employees typically have, the percentage with animal-induced allergies is significantly more than 30 percent.
我選B 因為是選項的假設支持了文章~ 所以如果是B, zoo workers need to swith to other occupations...所以however 的那句就是被支持了
但我又在E 徘徊~
因為如E 所說: in general populationwho have spent as much time with animals as zoo employees typically have, 通常會高過30% 而動物園因為一感染的人就轉工作 所以才會有低於一般數據的30%
~
请大家討論~說說自己的想法~ 謝謝大家~
