GWD11-37

[訪客]

Recent feminist scholarship con-
cerning the United States in the 1920’s
challenges earlier interpretations that
Line assessed the twenties in terms of the
(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement. This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women. These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15) the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance. Asked whether
women’s suffrage was a failure, these
s cholars cite the words of turn-of-the-
(20) century social reformer Jane Addams,
“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
general is failing?”
In some ways, however, these
scholars still present the 1920’s as a
(25) period of decline. After suffrage, they
argue, the feminist movement lost its
cohesiveness, and gender conscious-
ness waned. After the mid-1920’s, few
successes could be claimed by fem-
(30) inist reformers: little could be seen in
the way of legislative victories.
During this decade, however, there
was intense activism aimed at achiev-
ing increased autonomy for women,
(35) broadening the spheres within which
they lived their daily lives. Women’s
organizations worked to establish
opportunities for women: they strove to
secure for women the full entitlements
(40) of citizenship, including the right to hold
office and the right to serve on juries.

Q37:
The purpose of the second paragraph (lines 23-31) of the passage is to

A. suggest a reason why suffragist “promises” were not kept
B. contrast suffragist “promises” with the reality of the 1920’s
C. deplore the lack of successful feminist reform in 1920’s
D. explain a view held by feminist scholars
E. answer the question asked by Jane Addams

這題答案是d 我不太懂ㄝ
我想請問一下,在第2段中scholars是否有表達出他的態度呢??我覺得她們有argue事情,又說the feminist movement lost ....所以我感覺上他們很像有表達出態度.但是d 說 explain感覺上沒有態度出現,請問高手們為何選d??其他答案不好在哪

[訪客]

我想再問一下 這篇文章作者有出來表達意見嗎?? 如果有的話是在第幾段??

[agk99]

我認為作者沒有進來，只是單純的轉述，但似乎對做答沒有什麼幫助

[訪客]

不好意思喔 因為再貼文章時格式很難弄,這篇文章是有3段的.第3段是32行During this decade, however, there ......... 這一段算是作者進來表達意見嗎???

[訪客]

Q35:
The passage is primarily concerned with

A. providing evidence indicating that feminist reformers of the 1920’s failed to reach some of their goals
B. presenting scholarship that contrasts suffragist “promises” with the historical realities of the 1920’s
C. discussing recent scholarship concerning the achievements of women’s suffrage during the 1920’s and presenting an alternative view of those achievements
D. outlining recent findings concerning events leading to suffrage for women in the 1920’s and presenting a challenge to those findings
E. providing support for a traditional view of the success of feminist attempts to increase gender consciousness among women during the 1920’s
Answer:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q36:
It can be inferred that the author of the passage disagrees with the “new scholarship” mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the

A. degree to which the “promises” of the suffrage movement remained unkept
B. degree to which suffrage for women improved the morality of governance
C. degree to which the 1920’s represented a period of decline for the feminist movement
D. degree of legislative success achieved by feminist reformers during the 1920’s
E. accuracy of the view that a women’s voting bloc did not materialize once suffrage was achieved


這是本篇的另2題 我覺得本篇板上的答案翰GWD付的答案差距甚大,希望高手快來幫我解答,拜託 :'(

[訪客]

37.考段落題,要看這段在整篇文章的作用,第一段,主要講一些學者挑戰舊觀點,第二段開始轉折,作者在第二段有些出原因,就是那性別不在那麼明顯哪裡,第三段就是講之前的unkep promise陸續開始把他實現
這樣了嗎?

[訪客]

請問MIKELEE, 作者沒進來嗎,我覺得第3段像是作者在說話是這樣嗎??

[魚]

不好意思喔 因為再貼文章時格式很難弄,這篇文章是有3段的.第3段是32行During this decade, however, there ......... 這一段算是作者進來表達意見嗎???

小吳 ,你很細心喔 (Y)

不過 請記住喔 During this decade, however, there are intense 啪拉啪啦.........

作者有沒有進來 ? 有

作者進來提共了 " 作者以外的其他人"的主張論點

所以 才用 there are :)

致於 , 有沒有作者的態度在裡面 ? 單就這個key word 無法確定
還要看上下文才能決定


又 你把argue 的字義吹毛求疵了

argue 有時候沒有你以為的那麼強烈的態度 要看上下文決定


就跟compare一樣 你知道compare不可能出現在文章架構的題目選項中

但 其他類型的題目 compare 還是可以成立的

化有招為無招 !! 張三豐這麼說 , 風清揚也這麼說

應該錯不了

[ping0114]

這篇錯好多,實在不懂

請問37題A錯在哪裡呢?

再請問36題

完全摸不著頭緒....

[kikisky]

Q36問the author of the passage disagrees........
所以要回到第二段
找到
表達了態度的地方( lost,few)
就可以
清楚看到
答案選項裡應該要選的重點

Q37
第二段一開始
用了一個轉折的字眼---however
表達與上一段contrast的關係
如果
你要選A的話
A就會變成承接上一段
進一步說明原因的段落
和原文所表達的不同

以上。

[ping0114]

謝謝kikisky

但是針對36題還想再問一下下

因為題目中提到mentioned in lines 6-7
所以回到文中找資訊時都不會找到第二段

想請問該怎麼克服呢?

唉,閱讀真是弱呀

[kikisky]

嗯~你說的那個應該是
the “new scholarship” (who is) mentioned in lines 6-7 regarding the .....的意思~
也就是mentioned in lines 6-7 只是用來修飾new scholarship
所以可以說
真正句子的部份只有the author disagrees with the "new scholarship" regarding the.......
因此~重心當然要放在the author of the passage disagrees的地方囉~

[ping0114]

明白了
多謝
閱讀要加油~~

[blue123736]

這篇...

雖然知道第一段是在講 新興的學者挑戰一個過去的觀點

但是 這一個過去的觀點指的到底是什麼？

雖然這個部分問題中沒有提出

可是我看來看去文意已經被句子的結構搞混了

可以有人告訴我嗎？ :'(

[kikisky]

如果說是表新舊contrast的文章架構的話
那麼
new scholarship 所反對的就會是long-held view
new scholarship 所主張的就會是和long-held view相反的觀念
所以~

Recent feminist scholarship con-
cerning the United States in the 1920’s
challenges earlier interpretations that
Line assessed the twenties in terms of the
(5) unkept “promises” of the women’s
suffrage movement. This new scholar-
ship disputes the long-held view that
because a women’s voting bloc did not
materialize after women gained the right
(10) to vote in 1920, suffrage failed to
produce long-term political gains for
women. These feminist scholars also
challenge the old view that pronounced
suffrage a failure for not delivering on
(15) the promise that the women’s vote
would bring about moral, corruption-
free governance. Asked whether
women’s suffrage was a failure, these
s cholars cite the words of turn-of-the-
(20) century social reformer Jane Addams,
“Why don’t you ask if suffrage in
general is failing?”

所以~
應該可以明顯看出
old view認為是failure
而new scholarship 是相反的立場=也就是不認為是failure

希望有幫到你^ ^