Q34:
During the month of May, crabs arrive on Delaware’s beaches to lay eggs. Certain shorebirds depend on these eggs for food during their annual spring migration to their northern breeding grounds. Delaware’s crab population has declined recently. This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations: by remaining longer in Delaware, the birds will be able to eat enough crab eggs to allow them to complete their migration.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A.No other food available to the birds on Delaware’s beaches is as nutritious and accessible as are crab eggs.
B.The decline in the number of crabs on Delaware’s beaches is due to the harvesting of crabs by humans.
C.There are more crabs on Delaware’s beaches than in any other area that the migrating birds pass through.
D.The crabs do not conceal their eggs.
E.The earlier in the season the shorebirds complete their migration, the more likely they are to breed successfully.
這題看完, 完全找不到答案.....-_-
The argument : 雖然crab eggs減少, 但birds可以停留久一點吃飽再走, 所以crab數量減少沒差
想到可能的weaken: 1. crab eggs數量減少有差, 2 birds無法久留
A. 除了egg之外沒有其他食物給birds
B. crab減少是人為造成
C. D beach比其他beach有更多crab
D. crab不會把egg藏起來
E. bird越早完成migration, 表示他們越早吃飽
怎麼會是E呢? E只是敘述, 並沒有說bird就會早走,
加上題目說bird可以停久一點, 表示他們沒吃飽==> 不覺得有weaken的意思???