A greater number of newspapers are sold in Town S than in Town T. Therefore, the citizens of Town S are better informed about major world events than are the citizens of Town T.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the conclusion above EXCEPT:
(A) Town S has a larger population than Town T.
(B) Most citizens of Town T work in Town S and buy their newspapers there.
(C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T.
(D) A weekly newspaper restricted to the coverage of local events is published in Town S.
(E) The average newsstand price of newspapers sold in Town S in lower than the average price of
newspapers sold in Town T.
答案是E。對E選項有疑問,我覺得E選項也可以WEAKEN
S的平均價錢比較低,所以T的居民跑來S買,才造成了S的銷量大於T
因此,並不能達成結論S是better informed
而解答的意思是說E可以解釋S.T銷售差異但沒有WEAKEN
難道是我想太多?做了額外的推論?
請指教,謝謝！
OG-67
版主: shpassion, Traver0818
由 Ethan » 2004-12-17 14:31
Therefore, the citizens of Town S are better informed about major world events than are the citizens of Town T.這是結論。
(A) Town S has a larger population than Town T. 人多故賣的多，顯然結論無法成立，可以weaken。
(B) Most citizens of Town T work in Town S and buy their newspapers there. 隱含其實是T的人買的，顯然結論無法成立，可以weaken。
(C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T. 所有選項中，C直接weaken結論。既然spends less time reading newspapers就不能說better informed about major world events
(D) A weekly newspaper restricted to the coverage of local events is published in Town S. contradict the conclusion.
(E) The average newsstand price of newspapers sold in Town S in lower than the average price of newspapers sold in Town T.所以the number of newspapers are sold in Town S is graeter than that of town T這推論可以成立. 對結論不構成反駁。It doesn’t undermine the conclusion based on that difference. The price differential might help explain the difference in sales. OG’s explanation.
(A) Town S has a larger population than Town T. 人多故賣的多，顯然結論無法成立，可以weaken。
(B) Most citizens of Town T work in Town S and buy their newspapers there. 隱含其實是T的人買的，顯然結論無法成立，可以weaken。
(C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T. 所有選項中，C直接weaken結論。既然spends less time reading newspapers就不能說better informed about major world events
(D) A weekly newspaper restricted to the coverage of local events is published in Town S. contradict the conclusion.
(E) The average newsstand price of newspapers sold in Town S in lower than the average price of newspapers sold in Town T.所以the number of newspapers are sold in Town S is graeter than that of town T這推論可以成立. 對結論不構成反駁。It doesn’t undermine the conclusion based on that difference. The price differential might help explain the difference in sales. OG’s explanation.
- Ethan
- 高級會員
- 帖子: 454
- 注册: 2004-11-02 17:01
由 汪汪北鼻 » 2005-03-05 02:32
agk99 \$m[1]:高雄的報紙賣了三十萬份，台北賣了二十萬份，所以高雄的人比較了解國際大事
事實上，高雄有九百萬人，但台北只有二十萬人，高雄是三十個人才讀一份報紙，台北是人手一份報紙，高雄人就不見得比台北人了解國際大事了
這是我依題目直翻，請參考
謝謝agk99
, A選項確實是有繞個彎，但如果換個角度來說，高雄的報紙賣了三十萬份，台北賣了二十萬份，所以高雄的人比較了解國際大事
若高雄有三十萬人，但台北有九百萬人，那不就無法weaken了
我是不是想太多了
-
汪汪北鼻 - 高級會員
- 帖子: 392
- 注册: 2004-10-30 00:52
- 地址: Taipei
由 liwuu » 2005-03-05 10:49
汪汪北鼻 \$m[1]:agk99 \$m[1]:高雄的報紙賣了三十萬份，台北賣了二十萬份，所以高雄的人比較了解國際大事
事實上，高雄有九百萬人，但台北只有二十萬人，高雄是三十個人才讀一份報紙，台北是人手一份報紙，高雄人就不見得比台北人了解國際大事了
這是我依題目直翻，請參考
謝謝agk99
若高雄有三十萬人，但台北有九百萬人，那不就無法weaken了
我是不是想太多了
你這樣的假設就跟選項A不同囉...
選項A說明高雄的人口比台北的人口多...
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠，嘯傲風間；堪尋敵手共論劍，高處不勝寒
昂首千丘遠，嘯傲風間；堪尋敵手共論劍，高處不勝寒
-
liwuu - 白金會員
- 帖子: 1639
- 注册: 2004-11-17 06:02
由 enim » 2005-12-09 00:33
(C) The average citizen of Town S spends less time reading newspapers than does the average citizen of Town T.
我不太了解 為何c可以weaken？
讀報紙的時間比較短，就代表得到的資訊比較少？
只是看的速度快了點呀！！
請大大幫我解惑一下 謝謝
★Look for the clear light of truth.
∼Look for unknown new roads even when men's sight is keener far from now.
☆Divine wonder will never fail us.
★Every age has its own dream.
∼Leave then the dreams of yesterday.
☆You take the torch of knowledge and build the palace of the future.．．．．Madame Curie
∼Look for unknown new roads even when men's sight is keener far from now.
☆Divine wonder will never fail us.
★Every age has its own dream.
∼Leave then the dreams of yesterday.
☆You take the torch of knowledge and build the palace of the future.．．．．Madame Curie
-
enim - 中級會員
- 帖子: 245
- 注册: 2005-03-25 09:28
- 地址: Taiwan
由 enim » 2005-12-09 18:59
fiona \$m[1]:C應該看成S市的人花在閱讀的時間比T市的人少 是一種相對而非絕對的說法
如果還要把閱讀速度閱讀效率考慮在裡面 就變成過度推論了
請參考~~
Thank you fiona
哎 邏輯這東西...相對跟絕對（記下來
）
ps 雖然你的照片不是可愛的rain了 不過現在這個照片真的很符合天氣
★Look for the clear light of truth.
∼Look for unknown new roads even when men's sight is keener far from now.
☆Divine wonder will never fail us.
★Every age has its own dream.
∼Leave then the dreams of yesterday.
☆You take the torch of knowledge and build the palace of the future.．．．．Madame Curie
∼Look for unknown new roads even when men's sight is keener far from now.
☆Divine wonder will never fail us.
★Every age has its own dream.
∼Leave then the dreams of yesterday.
☆You take the torch of knowledge and build the palace of the future.．．．．Madame Curie
-
enim - 中級會員
- 帖子: 245
- 注册: 2005-03-25 09:28
- 地址: Taiwan
Re: OG-67
由 FiscJanet » 2005-12-14 14:26
汪汪北鼻 \$m[1]:mikelee \$m[1]:銷售量高S>T=>S比T市更better informed
E=>不能weaken到這個邏輯式子,因為題目沒有說價錢高低會是否會better informed
weaken裡面,不能他因得他果,只能他因得同果
請指教 8-|
這一題我也覺得怪，就A而言，S比T人口來的多為何能weaken呢?
人多報紙就賣的多嗎?報紙賣的多人民世界觀就廣嗎?
百思不解
今天正好複習到這題，根據我上江樸老師CR課的比較，這題(a)選項我補充
一下，(a)是說S的人口多於T的人口，所以老師說因為這就指出比較基準不
相同的問題，因為兩個相比的話，要不人數一樣或是依據比率去比，因此weaken上面的argument！
FYI
-
FiscJanet - 初級會員
- 帖子: 37
- 注册: 2005-10-07 23:35
在线用户
正在浏览此版面的用户：没有注册用户 和 6 位游客
Copyright © 2006-2009 FormosaMBA.com. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
• 简体中文语系由 PHPBB中文翻译小组 维护制作
