Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]Prep-T2-Q52

[問題]Prep-T2-Q52

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]Prep-T2-Q52

文章lovemifi » 2006-09-13 17:30

52. The two oil companies agreed to merge their refining and marketing operations
in the Midwest and the West, forming a new company for controlling nearly
fifteen percent of the nation’s gasoline sales.
正確答案(B) forming a new company that would control
想請教(A)是不是錯在應該用to control而不是用for controlling,加上(B)的句意較正確?
麻煩前輩先進們解答一下,謝謝
lovemifi
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 22
註冊時間: 2006-04-12 10:29

文章hibiscus » 2007-08-10 14:06

推推...
麻煩大大幫幫忙
thx
hibiscus
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 16
註冊時間: 2005-09-14 23:06

文章pockyqueen » 2007-08-10 14:42

(A) forming a new company for controlling
(B) forming a new company that would control
(C) which would form a new company that controlled
(D) which formed a new company for controlling
(E) which formed a new company that would control

句意應該是說這兩件公司的結合會組成一間control將近整個國家月15%的gasoline sales

CDE:which 不能指代兩件公司結合這整件事
A: for controling句意上不通, 如果說改成to control好像也怪, 我想這句話應該不是要說這兩個公司的結合是為了control 15% 的gasoline sales吧@@

你們覺得這樣說有道理嗎~
pockyqueen
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 41
註冊時間: 2007-07-12 23:46

文章nomade » 2007-08-11 22:47

that would control應該是修飾這家新公司可以control.....
句意上較符合

用would表示可能有nearly 15%也比較好
頭像
nomade
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 60
註冊時間: 2006-04-06 22:57
來自: Taipei

文章dibert8 » 2007-08-12 02:46

"for controling" 不對,因為 new company 可以做 control 這個動作,至少要用 "to control" (i.e. 動詞);句子會有動詞,所以選句子.

would 是 will 的過去式.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 12 位訪客

cron