[問題]GWD-2-Q21 保護土地(ETS更改題)

[nana]

GWD-2-Q21 保護土地(ETS更改題)
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


看的我眼花撩亂...還是選不出來.... :-S
HELP~

[nana]

自己頂一下
我選B

[liwuu]

我選D :-S

[micht]

(D) is my asnwer

That plan is ill-conceived: "____________" 框起來部分後接 為何the plan is ill-conceived. = evaluated why the plan is not possible

D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.

[游客]

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.(a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument)
They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.(a plan,支持第一句話的的計畫)
That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. (反對此計畫論點,不是反對goal的論點注意)
On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. (judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.)
But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.(支持下一句話的策略的evidence)
And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.(一個能夠支持goal的策略)

[ping0114]

我也選D

[小晃兄]

(D) is my asnwer

That plan is ill-conceived: "____________" 框起來部分後接 為何the plan is ill-conceived. = evaluated why the plan is not possible

D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.

這句話好像是說argument支持這個strategy，不知道我的理解有沒有錯，請各位牛牛指導一下，謝謝。

如果D說argument支持這個strategy，那應該就是錯的吧。

[sleek]

分享我的看法

D. 中所說的"a particular strategy."

是題目中的所述的 a more sensible preservation strategy,如下:

And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

[小晃兄]

恩，有道理，謝謝。

[chihhan123]

黃冠文老師的答案給D 沒錯

[davidslin]

GWD-2-Q21 保護土地(ETS更改題)
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


看的我眼花撩亂...還是選不出來.... :-S
HELP~

天山3Q23:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.

這題答案也是D,為啥兩題粗體字的部份不一樣,答案解釋居然相同???
感覺D選項用在天山這一題比較符合

http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=6485

[Francis]

我手邊的GWD-2-21居然是版上別人提到的天山題目 不過不管他
若是問
GWD-2-Q21 保護土地(ETS更改題)
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
我覺得答案是(E) 因為第一句黑體字是是他要推行這個計畫目標的假設，第二句黑體字是他預期有另一個情況導致一個不好的結果

但若是這一個題目
天山3Q23:
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land,provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
我覺得答案是（D）
因為第一句黑體字是提出一個目標，如何去達到這個目標的策略將會在論點作評估。第二句黑體字是提出這個策略的基礎假設。

[nexxt0722]

我的GWD-2-21也是本文中提到的天山題目3Q23

若以本文中的天山3Q23而言,我贊同答案是D

若以本文中的GWD-2-21,我實在選不太出來

因為所有的選項都說The first presents a goal ,

但GOAL不就是第一句,環保組織想要保留這塊土地嗎?

另外B,C選項前半段的結構看不太懂,也是我不知從何選起的原因之一

還請各位前輩牛人指導迷津,是我的邏輯理解有誤?還是題目選項有缺陷?

[pimi]

請問E選項哪裡不好呢??

[dibert8]

第一句粗體好像沒有選擇的餘地,因為五個答案都說它是 goal, 所以關鍵是接下來怎麼修是這個 goal.
(A) (B) (C) (E) that 關係代名詞直接修飾 goal, 關係子句也在主要結構中,所以that 對 goal 的正反面態度要對 => 刪除 (A) (B)
(C) 後半句否定了 goal ,所以 (C) 也可以去掉了.
(E) 似乎錯在 endorse 這個字: 1. 武斷字眼, 2. 與題目的描述有出入 (argument 有 endorse 目標嗎?)
(D) 1. evaluate 表示有正反, 2. strategies 是複數 => 題目裡真的有一個反的 (by purchasing that land),一個正的 (to assist the farmers to modernize their farms)

對於第二句粗體,首先面臨的是: 區分 argument, strategy, goal 各是什麼?
選項提供了線索: argument vs strategies => argument 必須代正負號,而且只有一個, strategy 多過一個.
依據這樣的判斷, argument = That plan is ill-conceived;
strategies = 1. by purchasing that land, 2. to assist the farmers to modernize their farms ;
goal 很明顯, 就是題目第一句話,簡單的說 = to preserve the land .
到這裡我們可以肯定 (E) 是錯的 (錯在 "that plan is ill-conceived" 無法為 "to preserve the land" 背書,兩者事實上背道而馳.)
(D) 的後半句話應該就沒什麼問題了.

所以 GWD-2-Q21 和 天山3Q23 的答案應該都是 (D), 但是我覺得 天山3Q23 粗體的位置劃的比較好.