[問題]GWD-23-39

[joyce0519]

GWD-23-Q39
In Gandania, where the government has a monopoly on tobacco sales, the incidence of smoking-related health problems has risen steadily for the last twenty years. The health secretary recently proposed a series of laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use in Gandania. Profits from tobacco sales, however, account for ten percent of Gandania’s annual revenues. Therefore, Gandania cannot afford to institute the proposed laws.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.All health care in Gandania is government-funded.
B.Implementing the proposed laws is not likely to cause a significant increase in the amount of tobacco Gandania exports.
C.The percentage of revenue Gandania receives from tobacco sales has remained steady in recent years.
D.Profits from tobacco sales far surpass any other single source of revenue for the Gandanian government.
E.No government official in Gandania has ever previously proposed laws aimed at curtailing tobacco use.

參考答案為A,我不太懂耶,要WEAKEN這個結論和HEALTH CARE為什麼會有關係呢？

[ergh]

我就我所理解的意思提出，若有錯還請指正

題目：執行法案→政府收入會減少→所以不要執行法案
weaken:All health care in Gandania is government-funded，重點應該是government-funded，若不執行法案→抽菸問題增加→政府費用增加。

以上參考

[rumi0302]

題目: 政府如果執行法案 -> 收入會減少

如果要 weaken的話 應該是要 執行法案 -> 收入會增加

照你的解答方式變成 不執行法案 -> 收入會增加 那不就變成support 了嗎?

醬對吧??!!

可是我覺得答案應該是要C ....因為如果 totacco 讓G 國的稅收 一值維持一樣,那就可以 weaken 題目所說的-> 不執行法案 = 收入增加

不是嗎??
有錯還請指教!!

[toycha]

題目: 政府如果執行法案 -> 收入會減少

如果要 weaken的話 應該是要 執行法案 -> 收入會增加

照你的解答方式變成 不執行法案 -> 收入會增加 那不就變成support 了嗎?

醬對吧??!!

可是我覺得答案應該是要C ....因為如果 totacco 讓G 國的稅收 一值維持一樣,那就可以 weaken 題目所說的-> 不執行法案 = 收入增加

不是嗎??
有錯還請指教!!

我支持答案A

題目:收入增加->執行法案

答案:收入減少->也可以執行法案，因為支出的費用減少

至於C我認為是錯在in recent year ，無相關...

[dibert8]

重點在 tabacco 國營獨占
(A) tobacco 和 health care 都是政府的錢, tobaco 賣的多,就傷到 health care
(B) 無關於 export
(C) 時間不對
(D) 再怎麼 far surpass 也是 10%, 少了就是少了,沒幫助!
(E) 無關於 propose