Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]Prep-T2-Q24

[問題]Prep-T2-Q24

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]Prep-T2-Q24

文章mandy-lo » 2007-03-18 04:31

24. The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including there wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.
A. merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
C. as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
D. mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
E. mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including

C選ans表示:C: that includes修飾前面的Germany,修飾對像不對,應該改成include?????
為何改成include,因為include不是動詞,這結果不就變成2V……….還是我的理解有誤????希望各位大大能幫忙解惑…………….
P.S.問了一堆...真不好意思.....希望大家見諒...... ;-$
mandy-lo
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 100
註冊時間: 2006-02-09 17:06

文章bakekab » 2007-07-27 16:13

found in Germany 是過去分詞 修飾 tools, 把 includes 改成 include 可以往前跳去修飾 tools, include 在這裡是動詞 沒錯
奮鬥的動力來自於心中的不服氣
頭像
bakekab
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 48
註冊時間: 2004-12-03 11:17

文章vantreal » 2007-07-27 16:56

請問B選項怎麼不見了?
vantreal
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 163
註冊時間: 2007-03-09 09:20

文章dibert8 » 2007-08-03 23:35

The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.

(A) merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
(B) as merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from examining tools found in Germany, which include
(C) as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
(D) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
(E) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including




Ans: E

(A) (B) 裡 scavenging 不是 people, 不平衡
(C) that = tools 主動詞不一致. i.e. includes => include
(D) which = tools 主動詞不一致. i.e. includes => include
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章Kal-El » 2007-11-06 11:18

請問~
The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.

這邊的rather than是介系詞or對等連接詞呢?

謝~
Kal-El
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 188
註冊時間: 2007-06-22 12:34

文章dibert8 » 2007-11-06 13:47

rather 副詞
than [對等]連接詞
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章chencraig0227 » 2007-11-17 17:58

對不起! 請問一個很笨的問題...!
在解答說 including是介係詞! 而我查longman其中including也特別獨立出來有介係詞的用法...!

這邊的including不能看作是分詞構句?
如果是分詞構句 不是會修飾到Germany?
如果是介係詞片語就不會修飾到Germany?
分詞構句跟介系詞片語在此題有差別嗎?

亂了亂了!! ;''(
頭像
chencraig0227
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2007-08-09 22:53

文章dibert8 » 2007-11-18 02:28

including 是個蠻特殊的字,寫成這副德性的時候,只會修飾到該修飾的字.表面看起來是動名詞,但是以句子裡慣用的功能來看,視為介係詞也無妨.(另外一個例子是 as well as, 這片語也偶而被當成介係詞喔!)就像一張王牌, including 幾乎不用考慮修飾的問題,只問它該不該在那兒!
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章chencraig0227 » 2007-11-18 03:49

dibert8 \$m[1]:including 是個蠻特殊的字,寫成這副德性的時候,只會修飾到該修飾的字.表面看起來是動名詞,但是以句子裡慣用的功能來看,視為介係詞也無妨.(另外一個例子是 as well as, 這片語也偶而被當成介係詞喔!)就像一張王牌, including 幾乎不用考慮修飾的問題,只問它該不該在那兒!



了解!!
您就像汪洋中一盞燈! 感激不盡...!
頭像
chencraig0227
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 236
註冊時間: 2007-08-09 22:53

文章pimi » 2008-01-03 13:16

想請問像BC答案都有as, 其他答案都沒有as, 是否此處的as可省略也可不省, 所以才沒列入討論呢???
pimi
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 388
註冊時間: 2005-01-21 14:50

文章dibert8 » 2008-01-05 13:58

as 是可以省略的.
選項顯示出不同,就是要考觀念的地方.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章little8 » 2008-01-25 20:25

dibert8 \$m[1]:The new image of Stone Age people as systematic hunters of large animals, rather than merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including three wooden spears that archaeologists believe to be about 400,000 years old.

(A) merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including
(B) as merely scavenging for meat, have emerged from examining tools found in Germany, which include
(C) as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
(D) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
(E) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, including




Ans: E

(A) (B) 裡 scavenging 不是 people, 不平衡
(C) that = tools 主動詞不一致. i.e. includes => include
(D) which = tools 主動詞不一致. i.e. includes => include


請教一下,要怎麼判斷
(B),which....
(C) that....
(D), which....
不是修飾Germany,而是修飾tools?
是因為found in Germany已經是修飾詞嗎?
還是一切以"句意"為上呢?

最近老是被這種類型的題目搞混?
little8
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 123
註冊時間: 2006-11-05 05:32

文章dibert8 » 2008-02-07 13:08

關係代名詞
1. 就近指代原則: that / which = Germany (句意不合理)
2. 句意: 主動詞不一致
怎麼看都不對.
including 直接找複數名詞 (tools), 句意對了 => (E)
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章Huang Hsin-Yi » 2008-04-25 14:46

dibert8 \$m[1]:關係代名詞
1. 就近指代原則: that / which = Germany (句意不合理)
2. 句意: 主動詞不一致
怎麼看都不對.
including 直接找複數名詞 (tools), 句意對了 => (E)

我認為including.......的子句,是修飾 The new image ;-$
Huang Hsin-Yi
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 1038
註冊時間: 2007-08-17 00:41
來自: Tainan

文章angela_yj0424 » 2008-06-19 00:04

C) as mere meat scavengers, has emerged from examining tools found in Germany that includes
(D) mere scavengers of meat, has emerged from the examination of tools found in Germany, which includes
想問C.D的that, which是修飾前面的Germany還是tools呢?還是說本來從句意上應該修飾tools,但是放在Germany後所以鄰近指代錯了?
Practice makes Perfect!!
頭像
angela_yj0424
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 35
註冊時間: 2007-08-08 01:38
來自: Canada

下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 18 位訪客

cron