[問題]Prep-T2-Q126

[mandy-lo]

126. Because she knew many of the leaders of colonial America and the American Revolution personally, Mercy Otis Warren was continually at or near the center of political events from 1765 to 1789, a vantage point combining with her talent for writing to make her one of the most valuable historians of the ear
(a) a vantage point combining with her talent for writing to make
(b) a vantage point, when combined with her talent for writing, that made
(c) a vantage point that combined with her talent for writing, and it made
(d) and this vantage point, which combined with her talent for writing to make
(e) and this vantage point, combined with her talent for writing, made
請教各位大大們,D選的解答 and後面句子不完整,不瞭解是什麼意思??請各位大牛們明示??

[blackblood]

and this vantage point, -->只有一個名詞,沒有動詞也沒有受詞
, which combined with her talent for writing to make.....ear. 是非限定,修飾vantage point 不是and句子裡的一部分

[mandy-lo]

感謝答覆.........

[qqwws]

請問(A)a vantage point combining with her talent for writing to make
只有錯在combining不是被動而已嗎..是不是combining只有人才可以用主動阿..
謝謝各位解答囉..

[dibert8]

(A) to make 的主詞是 vantage point, 而 vantage point 不會 make her one of the most valuable historians of the era
(B) 只有當與寫作天份結合時,才使她有價值 (語病)
(C) 1.前面所說是與寫作天份結合的優勢 (感覺上是靠寫作去認識名流,而非相輔相成,相得益彰), 2. it 指什麼? (writing, talent, point)
(D) and 句子沒有動詞
=> 選 (E) : 認識名流,加上寫作天份,使她價值不斐.
不知這樣思考對嗎?

[zephyr_h]

這一題，一直在(B) , (E)之間猶豫，粗心的時候總會先入為主選到（B）。

一開始，(B)常讓我誤認為是這種結構
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

-->Because she knew many of the leaders of colonial America and the American Revolution personally, Mercy Otis Warren was continually at or near the center of political events from 1765 to 1789, a vantage point that make her one of the most valuable historians of the ear .

但是，即使把when combined with her talnent for writing當作插入句，在這種句型下似乎都沒有一個好的位置可以插入而不造成曖昧，
但是如果把when combined with her talent for writing刪掉又歪曲句意。

後來發現只有
(E) Because S1+V+O , S1+V+O, and S2 +V+O是比較好，而且可以比較精準的把句意全部說完的句型。

[pimi]

A寫說a vantage point combining, 可以看成from 1765 to 1789的同位語, 但是a vantage point 不等於from 1765 to 1789, 所以A錯

請問大大, A可以用這個方法判別他錯嗎？？

[crazykai]

這樣看不知行不行

a vantage point combining with her talent - a vantage point 不能主動 combine with her talent

因此要改成a vantage point combined with her talent

大家討論看看嚕

[dibert8]

這樣看不知行不行

a vantage point combining with her talent - a vantage point 不能主動 combine with her talent

因此要改成a vantage point combined with her talent

大家討論看看嚕

同意囉!

[chencraig0227]

(b) a vantage point, when combined with her talent for writing, that made

請問：when在此除了句意上錯誤之外，文法上有誤嗎? 破解版上說when...沒有修飾對象? 可是修飾對象不是很明白就是 vantage point!?

(c) a vantage point that combined with her talent for writing, and it made

請問：在此it並不會優先指代vantage嗎? 我認為that後面子句是在修飾vantage, 因此it直接代vantage蠻直接的阿!?

曾經有過"代名詞不能指代插入句中的N"，適用在此狀況(同位語)嗎??

[sunnyblue13s]

1.when 後面要接完整的句子...這邊缺主詞....錯
2.it 可以代替前面出現過的單數名詞....只是優先代替主句主/最接近的單數名詞
..........這邊it 有歧意....可代 point 或是 talent........

淺見乙枚....請笑納~~

[chencraig0227]

1.when 後面要接完整的句子...這邊缺主詞....錯
2.it 可以代替前面出現過的單數名詞....只是優先代替主句主/最接近的單數名詞
..........這邊it 有歧意....可代 point 或是 talent........

淺見乙枚....請笑納~~

PP2-70. (28254-!-item-!-188;#058&003934)

Results from the 1998 National Demographic and Health Survey confirm
that, even when compared with densely populated countries like
Thailand and Indonesia, the Philippine nation's fertility rates consistently
exceed all of its Southeast Asian neighbors.

when主詞相同可以省略的吧!?

[sunnyblue13s]

GMAT他出題能用的句子~~在答案中~~我們不一定能使用~~

官...可以放火
百姓...不一定可以點燈~~

[FIG]

(b) a vantage point, when combined with her talent for writing, that made

請問：when在此除了句意上錯誤之外，文法上有誤嗎? 破解版上說when...沒有修飾對象? 可是修飾對象不是很明白就是 vantage point!?


(c) a vantage point that combined with her talent for writing, and it made

請問：在此it並不會優先指代vantage嗎? 我認為that後面子句是在修飾vantage, 因此it直接代vantage蠻直接的阿!?

曾經有過"代名詞不能指代插入句中的N"，適用在此狀況(同位語)嗎??

B.我覺得that代誰不清楚，代talent 似乎也可以

C.應該符合，同位語是說明用途可以乎略不看的，所以不代。
（其實很合理。如果同位，則代表前面有一樣的東西）
拿掉同位後，it代代誰不清楚

[mediayouth]

(b) a vantage point, when combined with her talent for writing, that made

請問：when在此除了句意上錯誤之外，文法上有誤嗎? 破解版上說when...沒有修飾對象? 可是修飾對象不是很明白就是 vantage point!?

(c) a vantage point that combined with her talent for writing, and it made

請問：在此it並不會優先指代vantage嗎? 我認為that後面子句是在修飾vantage, 因此it直接代vantage蠻直接的阿!?

曾經有過"代名詞不能指代插入句中的N"，適用在此狀況(同位語)嗎??

我覺得是這樣的：
(B) 原句: a vantage point that ... when (a vantage point was) combined with her talent for writing.
所以可將 when 子句插入在 that 的後面，如果插在that的前面會造成修飾的歧異 (that 不能離他修飾的物件太遠)

(C) a vantage point that ... 是同位語， ,and it made...是連接詞+主詞+動詞 和 同位與不平衡， 所以 it 不是指 a vantage point, 而是指 Mercy Otis Warren (如果優先代替原題主詞了話)，可是這樣句意就不對。所以 (C) 要嘛不平衡，要嘛就句意怪異 ，問題就出在 " ,and it made" 上

請大家指教囉~