Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]OG 73

[問題]OG 73

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG 73

帖子marchmarch » 2005-01-03 18:05

73. “Fast cycle time” is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also assures quality. The reason is that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.
The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that
(A) any flaw in work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occurring on a “fast cycle” production line
(B) the strategy of “fast cycle time” would require fundamental rethinking of product design
(C) the primary goal of the organization is to produce a product of unexcelled quality, rather than to generate profits for stockholders
(D) “fast cycle time” could be achieved by shaving time off each of the component processes in production cycle
(E) “fast cycle time” is a concept in business strategy that has not yet been put into practice in a factory


答案是(A),想不透(A) 與題目之關係。
奇怪以前都作對這題,這次卻作錯,還想不透? :( 大概頭腦突然打結了 :P
堅持我的心念
老天是不會虧待我的
marchmarch
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 597
注册: 2004-11-05 14:49

Re: [問題]OG 73

帖子Jessy » 2005-01-03 18:13

marchmarch \$m[1]:73. “Fast cycle time” is a strategy of designing a manufacturing organization to eliminate bottlenecks and delays in production. Not only does it speed up production, but it also assures quality. The reason is that the bottlenecks and delays cannot be eliminated unless all work is done right the first time.
The claim about quality made above rests on a questionable presupposition that
(A) any flaw in work on a product would cause a bottleneck or delay and so would be prevented from occurring on a “fast cycle” production line


答案是(A),想不透(A) 與題目之關係。
奇怪以前都作對這題,這次卻作錯,還想不透? :( 大概頭腦突然打結了 :P


請看紅色部分
嗯...看到這一題就想到一句成語叫做'防微杜漸' <--應該是這樣寫吧
爬文是一種美德....
Jessy
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
帖子: 1033
注册: 2004-11-07 11:52
地址: TPE

帖子liwuu » 2005-01-03 21:22

重點在於題目問quality...也就是問fast cycle 和 quality之間關係的假設!!
答案A:說明只要產品有瑕癡,則會產生bottleneck and delay並且可以透過fast cycle production line來預防!!
夫妻同心,其利斷金...Magical Mr. MISTOFFELEES
昂首千丘遠,嘯傲風間;堪尋敵手共論劍,高處不勝寒
头像
liwuu
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 1639
注册: 2004-11-17 06:02

Re: [問題]OG 73

帖子marchmarch » 2005-01-03 23:06

一直反覆看題目,好像懂了....
堅持我的心念
老天是不會虧待我的
marchmarch
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 597
注册: 2004-11-05 14:49

OG 73

帖子haijung » 2006-07-09 15:29

The claim about quality:如果都沒有bottlenecks and delays的話,生產就可以沒問題的完成-->確保品質

但是以上的claim是建立在一個有問題的假設立場: 所有產品如果有瑕疵都會產生bottlenecks and delays,也就會防止出現於fast cycle time的生產線

這個假設是有問題的,因為很有可能產品有瑕疵,但是沒有產生bottlenecks and delays,還是出現於fast cycle time,這樣的話品質就不保了。

和大家一起討論~
头像
haijung
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 89
注册: 2005-08-18 16:24

帖子dibert8 » 2007-04-10 13:35

閱讀測驗: 關鍵字 = presupposition => 題目裡一定有提過
只有 (A) 講的是題目提過的東西 (flaw in work cause bottleneck, delay)
(B) rethinking of product design 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(C) stockholders 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(D) shaving time off each of the component processes 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(E) not yet been put into practice in a factory 與題目相反,不是 presupposition
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17

帖子pleasela » 2008-02-29 11:13

dibert8 \$m[1]:閱讀測驗: 關鍵字 = presupposition => 題目裡一定有提過
只有 (A) 講的是題目提過的東西 (flaw in work cause bottleneck, delay)
(B) rethinking of product design 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(C) stockholders 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(D) shaving time off each of the component processes 題目沒有,不是 presupposition
(E) not yet been put into practice in a factory 與題目相反,不是 presupposition


cool ...
解的真痛快~
头像
pleasela
初級會員
初級會員
 
帖子: 73
注册: 2007-10-28 10:08


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 5 位游客