Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]Prep-T1-Q70

[問題]Prep-T1-Q70

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]Prep-T1-Q70

文章alva0930 » 2007-08-20 21:05

It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman species in their ability to learn behaviors from one another, or if, when other animals are studied in as much depth, similar patterns would be found.
(B) if other animals were studied with as much depth they would exhibit similar patterns
(C) would similar patterns be found in other animals if they were studied in as much depth
(D) whether similar patterns would be exhibited in other animals that were studied with as much depth
(E) whether other animals would exhibit similar patterns if they were studied in as much depth

請問(C)的錯誤在哪?
只能用whether X or whether Y而不能用whether X or Y?
或者(C)還有其它錯的地方呢?
alva0930
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 32
註冊時間: 2006-12-31 16:37

文章jamesbegins » 2007-08-20 22:45

(C)我是覺得 would similar patterns be found in other animals 這句主詞跑掉變成 similar patterns
那後面的 if 子句主詞they會不知道代誰...old Mo said : 代名詞擔任主詞 優先代替原句主詞....
然後又用被動 old Mo said : 被動少選被動少選被動少選.....
頭像
jamesbegins
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 38
註冊時間: 2007-05-25 00:27

文章dibert8 » 2007-08-22 13:12

(C) whether 不需要倒裝; 即使正裝,句意也不對稱.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章lucyyeh » 2007-08-22 14:10

此題答案是E,補給後人參考。
lucyyeh
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 410
註冊時間: 2007-03-22 12:20

文章kaijen » 2007-09-21 22:06

請問為什麼不選(D)?
(E)they不是ambiguous嗎? 可以代替animals也可以代替patterns?
Kevin Wang
Candidate for MBA, Class of 2011
Duke University, The Fuqua School of Business
kaijen.wang@fuqua.duke.edu
頭像
kaijen
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 177
註冊時間: 2006-06-01 01:14

文章dibert8 » 2007-09-22 01:15

(D) 1. 被動少選(不簡潔); 2. depth 不能當 studied 的受詞,需要介係詞
代名詞容易有指代的問題,原則上非必要不用; they 能找到合理的指代 (= animals), GMAT 還不太挑剔.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17

文章pimi » 2007-12-09 23:58

(E)的they真讓人選不下去, 因為在前面又個their ability
不過in depth是片語
(D)用with depth, 很明顯的錯誤
(A)(B)(C)又不夠(D)(E)對稱
真的是走投無路, 只好選(E)
pimi
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 388
註冊時間: 2005-01-21 14:50

文章Kal-El » 2007-12-10 11:32

It is unclear whether chimpanzees are unique among nonhuman species in their ability to learn behaviors from one another, or whether other animals would exhibit similar patterns if they were studied in as much depth.
第一個:their ability 的their 指的是 chimpanzees
第二個:they 指的是 other animals
Kal-El
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 188
註冊時間: 2007-06-22 12:34

文章三壘神童 » 2008-02-21 20:25

(D) whether similar patterns would be exhibited in other animals that were studied with as much depth
(E) whether other animals would exhibit similar patterns if they were studied in as much depth
不好意思 有問題還未釐清
D 選項 應該是錯在被動用法不好 以及 with much depth 非慣用

但我想請問

E 選項 的 they照邏輯來看應該是要指other animals才正確 ,但題幹中明顯their已經指 chimpanzees 了 我想請問they和their可以指代不同的 東西嗎 ??
三壘神童
新手會員
新手會員
 
文章: 7
註冊時間: 2007-01-25 15:56

文章dibert8 » 2008-02-24 06:41

次要結構和主要結構的代名詞似乎不需要一致.
可以觀察看看.
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2202
註冊時間: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 13 位訪客