[問題]OG92

[jay41]

92. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many changes at once as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
(A)so many changes at once as they had in
(B)at once as many changes as
(C)at once as many changes that there were with
(D)as many changes at once as they confronted in
(E)so many changes at once that confronted them in
ANS:D

莫ㄅㄟㄅㄟ說，(D)as many changes at once as they confronted in，的第二個as當關代受詞，代changes..........
有哪為大大能在詳細的解釋一下這種語法嗎？
還有能翻一下本題嗎...........

謝謝....

[agk99]

原句倒裝，強調never

在遭遇1986租稅改革法案之前，納稅人從未遭遇如此多的改變

我的理解是肯定句 as many as, 至於第二個as做關代受詞，我還真不懂哩，請其他同學補充

[micht]

有的

這題和

187. In one of the bloodiest battles of the Civil War, fought at Sharpsburg, Maryland, on September 17, 1862, four times as many Americans were killed as would later be killed on the beaches of Normandy during D-Day.

(A) Americans were killed as
(B) Americans were killed than
(C) Americans were killed than those who
(D) more Americans were killed as there
(E) more Americans were killed as those who

Ans: A

and in C and E, those who is a wordy intrusion. In D and E, more is redundant because the phrase four times as many in the original sentence conveys the idea of more.

who 在這裡是多於不需要再有一個代名詞出現
因為as可做"代名詞"

[agk99]

micht 可是這位jay同學是指關代"受詞"
你有印象嗎

[bugubugu]

micht 可是這位jay同學是指關代"受詞"
你有印象嗎

有滴...
莫北北說...
as可當受詞關代接S+V...
或當主詞關代接V...

[魚]

就是文法觀念中的[highlight=yellow]"準關代"[/highlight]





另外 ,agk 同學 ,您不但沒有提醒新朋友"沒有劃線"這種違規 的行為 ,還爽快的發言.

導致布穀同學 及 micth同學ㄧ時不察高興的回答呼呼mt23

你說 ! 你要怎辦 ? 接下我的戰帖吧 ~

吼 ~~ ((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

[Behemoth]

又要戰了喔

好的 一如往昔 我還是已經抓牢坐穩第一排的觀眾席

請隨時開始

[agk99]

杰倫41同學

以後要畫線，別忘了，我會被罵的

[jay41]

版主大人和各位同學們.........sorry啦..........
一時的疏忽造成您們的麻煩..........
請您們原諒小弟一時的糊塗，下次一下會注意的........

內心覺得準備考試是一條漫長且寂寞的路.......
但是看到有這麼多同學熱心的在回答我的問題，
就會讓我有動力撐下去......

再次感謝各位同學熱心回答我的問題.........

[魚]

版主大人和各位同學們.........sorry啦..........
一時的疏忽造成您們的麻煩..........
請您們原諒小弟一時的糊塗，下次一下會注意的........

捷倫同協 ,我好不容易抓到版主大人的小辮子

你要死不認錯啦 ~ 醬我才能不停的"侮辱"他

哇哈ㄏ哈哈

內心覺得準備考試是一條漫長且寂寞的路.......

嗯 的確 ,就跟台灣ㄧ樣 ~~~~ anyway ,一起加油吧衝衝衝

[8妹]

micht 可是這位jay同學是指關代"受詞"
你有印象嗎

有滴...
莫北北說...
as可當受詞關代接S+V...
或當主詞關代接V...

在og#132

[cheyen]

有人可以解釋 一下E選項嗎
把D和E E還原
D
Taxpayers had never confronted as many changes at once before as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

E
Taxpayers had never confronted so many changes at once before that they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
----------
對E項
OG只解釋so many....that 不慣用,我想的是因為E還原後句意與原本的根本不合 所以錯哩?

[knowledgegap]

og的解釋E presents an unidomatic comparison with "so many...that"
不是說so...that不慣用, 是說要comparision的話不能用因果句 ,你可能漏看comparison了

[世界和平]

有人可以解釋 一下E選項嗎
把D和E E還原
D
Taxpayers had never confronted as many changes at once before as they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

E
Taxpayers had never confronted so many changes at once before that they had in the Tax Reform Act of 1986.
----------
對E項
OG只解釋so many....that 不慣用,我想的是因為E還原後句意與原本的根本不合 所以錯哩?

(D) (E) 選項後面打錯囉！應該是confronted！

如果是had就不對了，因為OG有解釋:
the past perfect had [confronted] illogically places the 1986 events in the same time frame as Never before had...; a simple past tense is needed to present the 1986 events as following the earlier ones.

[sisco]

請教

So many as 用於否定句
As many as 用於肯定句 對嗎

但 Never 不是也有定的意思嗎

急問