Passage 35 (general to specific)(social)
Two divergent(分叉) definitions have dominated sociologists’ discussions of the nature of ethnicity(種族地位). The first emphasizes the primordial(原始的) and unchanging character of ethnicity. In this view, people have an essential need for belonging that is satisfied by membership in groups based on shared ancestry(世系) and culture. A different conception of ethnicity de-emphasizes the cultural component and defines ethnic groups as interest groups. In this view, ethnicity serves as a way of mobilizing a certain population behind issues relating to its economic position. While both of these definitions are useful, neither (no one) fully captures the dynamic and changing aspects of ethnicity in the United States. Rather, ethnicity is more satisfactorily conceived of as a process in which preexisting communal(全體共用的) bonds and common cultural attributes are adapted for instrumental purposes according to changing real-life situations.
In the 1st paragraph, the Arthur suggests two different ways to view ethnicity. One emphasizes the primordial features; people have essential need to belong a group; a different concept de-emphasize the cultural and ancestry value....
One example of this process is the rise of participation by Native American people in the broader United States political system since the Civil Rights movement of the 1960’s. Besides leading Native Americans to participate more actively in politics (the number of Native American legislative officeholders more than doubled), this movement also evoked (cause) increased interest in tribal history and traditional culture. Cultural and instrumental components of ethnicity are not mutually exclusive, but rather reinforce one another.
In the 2nd Paragraph, the author presents an example, that Native American tried to broad their political activities. CRM leads native people to participate more political activities and cause lots of people to research history and traditional culture. The author also makes a conclusion that cultural and instrumental factors are reinforce one another.
(承接) The Civil Rights movement also brought changes in the uses to which ethnicity was put by Mexican American people. In the 1960’s, Mexican Americans formed community-based political groups that emphasized ancestral heritage as a way of mobilizing constituents (動員組織成員). Such emerging issues as immigration and voting rights gave Mexican American advocacy groups the means by which to promote ethnic solidarity. Like European ethnic groups in the nineteenth-century United States, late-twentieth-century Mexican American leaders combined ethnic with contemporary civic symbols. In 1968 Henry Censors, then mayor of San Antonio, Texas, cited Mexican leader Benito Juarez as a model (以誰做為榜樣) for Mexican Americans in their fight for contemporary civil rights. And every year, Mexican Americans celebrate Cinco de Mayo as fervently(一樣熱情) as many Irish American people embrace St. Patrick’s Day (both are major holidays in the countries of origin), with both holidays having been reinvented in the context of the United States and linked to ideals, symbols, and heroes of the United States
第三段,考點最多,請注意