[問題]考古題0310題號30-39 reading

[ymh1330]

考古題-2003.10 閱讀 第4篇(#30-39)

Contemporary readers, forgetting the origins of western epic, lyric, and dramatic forms, are easily disposed to think of “literature” only as something written. But on reflection it becomes clear [b]that the more critically useful as well as the more frequently employed sense of the term concerns the artfulness of the verbal creation, not its mode of presentation.[/b]

第1句還可以:當代讀者傾向認為"文學"就是那些被寫下的東西,而忘了其源起於西方的史詩,詩歌和戲劇各種形式
然後...失讀...無法總結大意?
幫幫忙!!

[marchmarch]

樓主~~請看發文格式
http://www.chemy.idv.tw/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=2041

感謝你的配合

[ymh1330]

知了,謝謝提醒!

那....要重PO嗎,還是...
因為不是問題目,而是問文章,所以未FOLLOW
sorry

[marchmarch]

知了,謝謝提醒!

那....要重PO嗎,還是...
因為不是問題目,而是問文章,所以未FOLLOW
sorry

不用重po，直接改文章主題就行囉
改完了，我幫你去叫人來翻

[Behemoth]

考古題-2003.10 閱讀 第4篇(#30-39)

Contemporary readers, forgetting the origins of western epic, lyric, and dramatic forms, are easily disposed to think of “literature” only as something written. But on reflection it becomes clear that the more critically useful as well as the more frequently employed sense of the term concerns the artfulness of the verbal creation, not its mode of presentation.

第1句還可以:當代讀者傾向認為"文學"就是那些被寫下的東西,而忘了其源起於西方的史詩,詩歌和戲劇各種形式
然後...失讀...無法總結大意?
幫幫忙!!

標題記得改喔! 我剛不小心幫你翻了 希望版主放我一馬不要殺了我



後人解讀後發現上述形式中更有用處,更常被應用的是文字創造的藝術性,而非其表現模式