版主: shpassion, Traver0818
simommmm \$m[1]:
From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country of Jurania increased by 4.5 percent, and total consumption of poultry products there increased by 9.0 percent. During the same period, the population of Jurania increased by 6 percent, in part due to immigration to Jurania from other countries in the region.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them?
A.During the 1980’s in Jurania, profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did profits of wholesale distributors of fish.
B.For people who immigrated to Jurania during the 1980’s, fish was less likely to be a major part of their diet than was poultry.C.In 1989 Juranians consumed twice as much poultry as fish.
D.For a significant proportion of Jurania’s population, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of their diet during the 1980’s.
E.Per capita consumption of fish in Jurania was lower in 1989 than in 1980.
正確答案E
我想請問 有沒有人覺得答案B也可推得呢?
我的理由是 80年代 魚的消費量上升4.5% 家畜消費量上升9% 人口上升6%
那啟不是可推得-->對這段期間的移民而言,魚較家畜不可能成為主食
不過 剛剛自己寫下推理過程的同時 我想到一個可能原因
是因為...in part due to immigration...的關係嗎
也就是說 有可能不是顯示這些移民的飲食喜好 而是顯示其他人口的飲食喜好
FionaV \$m[1]:請問一下..為什麼D不行呢?
正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 5 位游客