Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 查看主题 - [問題]OG116

[問題]OG116

邏輯思維的訓練,考試戰場上的對決

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]OG116

帖子chloemoney » 2005-08-02 18:54

Laws requiring the use of headlights during daylight hours can prevent automobile collisions. However, since daylight visibility is worse in countries farther from the equator, any such laws would obviously be more effective in prevention collisions in those countries. In fact, the only countries that actually have such laws are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

Which of the following conclusions could be most properly drawn from the information given above?

(A) Drivers in the continental United States who used their headlines during the day would be just as likely to become involved in a collision as would drivers who did not use their headlights.
(B) In many countries that are farther from the equator than is the continental United States poor daylight visilibty is the single most important factor in automobile collisions.
(C) The proportion of automobile collisions that occur in the daytime is greater in the continental United States than in the countries that have daytime headlight laws.
(D) Fewer automobile collisions probably occur each year in countries that have daytime headlight laws than occur within the continental United States.
(E) Daytime headlight laws would probably do less to prevent automobile collisions in the continental United States than they do in the countries that have the laws.



我覺得我這題是句意上有問題,
先說一下我對題目的理解
先給了三個前題
前題一,白天要開前照燈法可以預防車禍
二,因為離赤道較遠的國家,白天的視線較差,所以這種法在這些國家預防車禍上更加有效。
三,離赤道較遠,唯一有這種法的國家是美國。

A-->和前題一相抵觸
B-->前題三沒有提出(且有武斷的字眼most)
C, D-->如og解,所有前題中,沒有資訊給我們得知量

E我不懂為何對,我對句子的翻譯是「白天開前照燈法在其他有這個法的國家預防車禍,比在美國有效」.....>___<
可是前題不是有說美國是離赤道較遠,唯一有這個法的國家嗎? 這麼一來,他應該是有這個法的國家中比較有效的呀?

還是其他有這個法的國家白天視線比美國好,所以又加上這個法,所以比較有效呢?..............................

感謝.........
時光無法倒流,我只想大步向前
chloemoney
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 81
注册: 2004-11-14 12:54
地址: 新竹

帖子cocaine » 2005-08-03 00:19

1,白天要開前照燈法可以預防車禍
2.因為離赤道較遠的國家,白天的視線較差,所以這種法在這些國家預防車禍上更加有效。
3.有這樣律法的國家大多都比美國還要更偏離赤道.(表示說美國不太需要這樣方法)

題目問結論:
E比較合題.說明這樣的法律在美國沒啥用..
努力,才有甜蜜的果實
头像
cocaine
高級會員
高級會員
 
帖子: 502
注册: 2004-12-23 23:53
地址: Mar

帖子chloemoney » 2005-08-03 13:05

了解,這也是個比較要同類呀.....................
時光無法倒流,我只想大步向前
chloemoney
中級會員
中級會員
 
帖子: 81
注册: 2004-11-14 12:54
地址: 新竹

帖子dibert8 » 2007-04-11 15:05

是的,在這題:國家與國家比
dibert8
白金會員
白金會員
 
帖子: 2202
注册: 2007-01-08 01:17


回到 GMAT Critical Reasoning 考區

在线用户

正在浏览此版面的用户:没有注册用户 和 5 位游客