Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [問題]考古題Form14 Q15

[問題]考古題Form14 Q15

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[問題]考古題Form14 Q15

文章cleashen » 2005-10-18 10:18

If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric line electronic equiptment.

(b)If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atomoshere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(c)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(d)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(e)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but

答案是(c)
但是我想請問一下 (b)是錯在not+V+N, but rather + N 不平衡上面嗎??
還是他的假設用法有錯的地方??

懇請大家幫忙指教 感謝!!!h
cleashen
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 41
註冊時間: 2005-08-17 02:10

Re: [問題]考古題Form14 Q15

文章林小馬 » 2005-10-18 16:34

cleashen \$m[1]:答案是(c)
但是我想請問一下 (b)是錯在not+V+N, but rather + N 不平衡上面嗎??
還是他的假設用法有錯的地方??

懇請大家幫忙指教 感謝!!!h


我想主要就是你說的平衡結構有問題吧
假設法好像沒錯
有人可以幫忙指正一下嗎?
林小馬
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 367
註冊時間: 2005-08-23 20:58
來自: Taiwan

文章hughes0305 » 2006-01-01 17:26

小弟淺見, 歡迎指正:

(b) 的假設法是多餘的, 這題的句意似乎不需要用到假設法來表達, 而且因為假設法所帶來的 were to be detonated (被動), 也造成簡潔原則的困擾!
頭像
hughes0305
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 179
註冊時間: 2005-11-01 23:50
來自: Maryland-USA

Re: [問題]考古題Form14 Q15

文章stilalala » 2006-01-02 12:37

cleashen \$m[1]:If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric line electronic equiptment.

(b)If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atomoshere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(c)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(d)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(e)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but

答案是(c)
但是我想請問一下 (b)是錯在not+V+N, but rather + N 不平衡上面嗎??
還是他的假設用法有錯的地方??

懇請大家幫忙指教 感謝!!!h


這題要注意
(a)不能用nor,要用or
(b)不平衡
(c)對,因為
A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

a nuclear ...would (其實就隱藏了假設法在其中)
用or 也對, but rather也平衡

(d)(e)都不平衡
stilalala
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 185
註冊時間: 2005-03-08 22:54

Re: [問題]考古題Form14 Q15

文章eiswein » 2006-08-15 18:26

stilalala \$m[1]:
cleashen \$m[1]:If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atmosphere, it would generate not a blast, shock, nor heat, but an intense electromagnetic pulse disrupting, like a lightning bolt, all unshielded electric line electronic equiptment.

(b)If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atomoshere, it would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(c)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(d)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, or heat, but rather

(e)A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would not generate a blast, shock, nor heat, but

答案是(c)
但是我想請問一下 (b)是錯在not+V+N, but rather + N 不平衡上面嗎??
還是他的假設用法有錯的地方??

懇請大家幫忙指教 感謝!!!h


這題要注意
(a)不能用nor,要用or
(b)不平衡
(c)對,因為
A nuclear weapon denoted above the atmosphere would generate no blast, shock, or heat, but rather

a nuclear ...would (其實就隱藏了假設法在其中)
用or 也對, but rather也平衡

(d)(e)都不平衡


不好意思,想請問一下
我知道C不對,因為不平衡
但是我看不出跟什麼東西不平衡?哪裡不平衡?

可以拜託解釋一下嗎?謝謝
頭像
eiswein
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 181
註冊時間: 2006-04-13 21:53
來自: Ann Arbor, Michigan

文章Jen-Cheng » 2006-08-15 19:00

這題我覺得用假設語氣不太好,因為"If a nuclear weapon were to be denoted above the atomoshere",用了"were"代表與現在事實相反,但是真的與事實相反嗎?我倒覺得有可能。
common example:1. If I were you 2.If the sun were to be rise from west,這是不爭的事實,一定不可能發生。

as for B: would not generate a blast, shock, or heat,感覺起來好像是a blast, a shock, or a heat,提出公因式"a",變來的。但是heat 應該是不可數
; 相對的 c用了 no,管它後面是加可數還是不可數都可以用no, 所以c優於B
no=not any=not a= not an

個人淺見..大家討論看看
Jen-Cheng
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 97
註冊時間: 2006-04-15 15:51
來自: Hualien


回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 4 位訪客