Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112

Deprecated: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is deprecated, use preg_replace_callback instead in /home/formosam/public_html/phpBB3/includes/bbcode.php on line 112
FormosaMBA 傷心咖啡店 • 檢視主題 - [討論]GWD1-Q7

[討論]GWD1-Q7

永遠是「句意」為上...文法次之...

版主: shpassion, Traver0818

[討論]GWD1-Q7

文章illuna » 2004-09-11 18:41

Q7:
A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times

B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio

E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times


答案B

咦....大家都不覺得這題怪怪的嗎? ^o)

有沒有發現that子句中動詞在哪??如果說是earn的話為什麼會是複數型態的動詞呢??主詞CEO's(CEO的所有格)應該是單數的呀.....

這題我們今天下午讀書會一起討論的時候發現....是不是應該要改成以下這樣才能解釋呢:

A recent review of pay scales indicates that CEOs now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times in 1980.

變成複數的CEOs才能對應複數的blue-collar workers勒?

還是大家有其他的想法??請討論..... *-)
頭像
illuna
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 331
註冊時間: 2004-07-30 14:13
來自: Stats ChipPac Taiwan

文章Grace » 2004-09-11 22:10

這一題我也搞不懂為什麼CEO要用所有格... 如果是所有格的話 後面接earn 動詞, 真的很奇怪, 我下週二上SC時再來問一下老師好了!
Grace
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 171
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 21:42
來自: Kaohsiung

文章agk99 » 2004-09-12 00:35

我的看法是
CEO's這個所有格是對應the pay of blue-collar workers
基本上沒問題
earn沒加s是不妥沒錯,但這題還是得勉強選B
至於你改寫的,average寫在句子裡看起來怪怪的,然後你的,compared to a ratio of 42 times也不好,應把a ratio和compared對調
也就是, a ratio compared to 42 times才對,畢竟compared若是看成which is compared(簡化修飾為compared to),會有which修飾歧異的可能
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章 » 2004-09-12 00:38

剛剛去google找了一下

CEO 的單複數型及所有格狠混亂


有的時候 CEO's 也是 CEO的複數型 ;)

參考書名 :

http://search.barnesandnoble.com/bookSe ... 4+12:35:26
白金會員
白金會員
 
文章: 2290
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 19:24

文章agk99 » 2004-09-12 00:41

那若是CEO單複數同型,大夥就記下來吧,答案我認為沒啥問題
agk99
超級版主
超級版主
 
文章: 3109
註冊時間: 2004-08-24 22:12
來自: Shenzhen, China

文章bugubugu » 2004-12-15 01:16

請問大家不會覺得這題的compared to 很怪嗎?
雖然五個選項都是compared to ...
compared to 不是比喻的意思嗎?
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章odinhsu » 2004-12-15 01:40

這裡的CEO's應該不是所以格,如果是的話....earn就是名詞囉,那now怎麼解釋...
所以我比較傾向earn是動詞now是副詞修飾earn...
這題我是先刪掉DE因為她們沒有 that
之後AC的compared... 和 as compared...
你只要問誰跟誰比....你就不會選了
你要阿,你想要我會給你的,你想要我不會不給你的,不會你想要我不給你,你不想要我卻偏偏要給你,大家講道理嘛~~~
頭像
odinhsu
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 141
註冊時間: 2004-12-11 00:30

文章James » 2004-12-15 02:09

這題莫老已經解了,考indicate,代名詞,比較要同類
CEO's是複數
indicate+ that ->B,C
C的their 可指CEO's,也可指workers-->ambiguity
所以答案是B
Aim high, soaring; aim low, sorry.
Don't pray for tasks equal to your powers; pray for powers equal to your tasks.
James
黃金會員
黃金會員
 
文章: 959
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 01:55

文章Eileenwang » 2004-12-23 15:11

bugubugu \$m[1]:請問大家不會覺得這題的compared to 很怪嗎?
雖然五個選項都是compared to ...
compared to 不是比喻的意思嗎?


這裡我也覺得有點怪耶
是不是說現在CEO平均賺比藍領階級的419倍就像是1980年賺42倍
有人可以說明一下嗎? i60
MBA? 打從下定決心申請的那一刻起就已經踏上MBA的不歸路了。
頭像
Eileenwang
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 99
註冊時間: 2004-10-28 08:39

文章bugubugu » 2005-01-14 21:59

bugubugu \$m[1]:請問大家不會覺得這題的compared to 很怪嗎?
雖然五個選項都是compared to ...
compared to 不是比喻的意思嗎?



引James在gwd6-18的話:
http://www.formosamba.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=445
在解釋GWD1-Q7時,莫老本來要挑compared to 的毛病,想用compared with,但他發現不是這個問題,所以他說美國人把這兩者混用了


醬解釋了我的疑問....
供大家參考...
bugubugu
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 341
註冊時間: 2004-08-25 16:05

文章林小馬 » 2005-09-13 23:39

B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times

想請問一下有人覺得B的這個compares很奇怪嗎
好像大部分都是用compared with/to
因為是
人去compare兩個東西
東西被compared

請解惑一下喔 多謝多謝
林小馬
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 367
註冊時間: 2005-08-23 20:58
來自: Taiwan

文章Janet » 2005-10-31 19:55

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
我本來選A,請問A是不是錯在比較不同類?因為CEO's與blue-collar workers比
B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
覺得B選項後面很怪,a ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980這邊ratio與in 1980比,這樣比較有同類嗎?
C. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratio
their--指代不清,可只CEO也可指workers
D. CEO’s who now earn on average 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, as compared to 42 times their pay, the ratioindicate+that去DE
E. CEO’s now earning an average of 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, compared to the ratio of 42 times
indicate+that去DE
熱情優雅百分百的Janet
Janet
中級會員
中級會員
 
文章: 136
註冊時間: 2005-08-04 21:50

文章ivygirl » 2005-11-08 23:28

關於AB選項
我跟Janet有同樣疑問...
有誰能解釋一下呢? ^^"
夢想的路,總是崎嶇難行!
頭像
ivygirl
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 60
註冊時間: 2004-12-29 23:53

文章michelle610 » 2005-11-11 19:29

A. that CEO’s now earn an average of 419 times more pay than blue-collar workers, compared to a ratio of 42 times
我本來選A,請問A是不是錯在比較不同類?因為CEO's與blue-collar workers比

that CEO’s now earn an average ---->沒有人賺平均數的,也是比較不同類---平均數與藍領工人比

B. that, on average, CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers, a ratio that compares to 42 times
我覺得B選項後面很怪,a ratio that compares to 42 times in 1980這邊ratio與in 1980比,這樣比較有同類嗎?

a ratio that compares to 42 times---->這應該是"CEO’s now earn 419 times the pay of blue-collar workers"的同位語


個人淺見 如有錯 請指教
背靠傳統 才知道未來該往哪裡去
頭像
michelle610
高級會員
高級會員
 
文章: 320
註冊時間: 2005-03-21 09:33

文章revival » 2005-12-06 22:55

請問這題(B)選項的後面 a ration that compares to 42 times in 1980
這邊是在in 1980前省略了ratio嗎 不然怎麼和年代比呢
revival
初級會員
初級會員
 
文章: 28
註冊時間: 2005-09-21 21:01

下一頁

回到 GMAT Sentence Correction 考區

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客